Re: [racket-users] Mann-Whitney test?

Yo! This conversation has gone seriously off-topic. Can y'all carry it on with some other subject line? --Mitch On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Tim Chase wrote: > Here is an interesting alternative: https://www.opencpu.org. > > You communicate with R processes via JSON.

Re: [racket-users] Mann-Whitney test?

Here is an interesting alternative: https://www.opencpu.org. You communicate with R processes via JSON. So, you wouldn't want a lot of back-and-forth, but I can see doing some setup logic and data prep in Racket, then sending off the JSON request, then interpreting the results. OpenCPU

Re: [racket-users] Mann-Whitney test?

You _could_ use the FFI, but you'd have to use the Racket FFI to go to C, and then use R's FFI to go to C, and then coerce all of R's data to Racket and all of Racket's data back to R. Because of this (provided no one makes a #lang R first ;) ), I think it would be easier to just spawn up a new

Re: [racket-users] Mann-Whitney test?

> Does anybody have an implementation of the Mann-Whitney U test (or the > equivalent Wilcoxson Rank test) in Racket? I imagine I could easily hack up > my own, but somebody else may have done a better job of it already. I see that no one has answered this question yet. This is something

[racket-users] Mann-Whitney test?

Does anybody have an implementation of the Mann-Whitney U test (or the equivalent Wilcoxson Rank test) in Racket? I imagine I could easily hack up my own, but somebody else may have done a better job of it already. --Mitch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google