Re: [racket-users] Re: Building regexen in at-exp

Sort of. at a high level pseudo code view I have a file of things the user inputs a list of things for each thing the user inputs it finds all reference in the file of things To put it plainly if you are familiar with Princeton's word net db/files I am searching the words in a user inputted

Re: [racket-users] Re: Building regexen in at-exp

*@pregexp{^@a}* is read as *(pregexp "^" a)* [you can test this by evaluating the quoted form, '*@pregexp{^@a}* ], but the function pregexp expects a single string as its first argument (and, apparently, a function or #f as its optional second argument). More generally, the body part of an

Re: [racket-users] Re: Building regexen in at-exp

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Ken MacKenzie wrote: > In a future version of what I am working on I see regex being an excellent > solution. My search is against a file I load into a list at program > initialization. However for other parts of this to load a list based

[racket-users] Re: Building regexen in at-exp

In a future version of what I am working on I see regex being an excellent solution. My search is against a file I load into a list at program initialization. However for other parts of this to load a list based on a partial file filtered with regex may be a better solution. There is also