On 23/06/15 00:00, Robby Findler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Aidan Gauland:
If this does what you want, it’s fine, but the define/contract is probably
unnecessary, and
(define fish-freshness/c
(flat-named-contract ‘fish-freshness/c
(lambda (x)
(not (eq? ….)
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Aidan Gauland aidal...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
On 23/06/15 00:00, Robby Findler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Aidan Gauland:
If this does what you want, it’s fine, but the define/contract is probably
unnecessary, and
(define fish-freshness/c
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Aidan Gauland aidal...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
If this does what you want, it’s fine, but the define/contract is probably
unnecessary, and
(define fish-freshness/c
(flat-named-contract ‘fish-freshness/c
(lambda (x)
(not (eq? ….)
Should do
On 22/06/15 04:26, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
On Jun 21, 2015, at 5:41 AM, Aidan Gauland wrote:
Say I want to define a flat contract for the freshness field of my
fish class, so I define a contract for it like so:
(define/contract fish-freshness/c
(- any/c
boolean?)
4 matches
Mail list logo
