[racket-users] Re: Slack IRC bridge malfunctioning

2016-02-09 Thread Jack Firth
I'd like to note that the bridge has been restored, and the wormhole is functioning properly now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[racket-users] Re: Slack IRC bridge malfunctioning

2016-02-08 Thread Jack Firth
Slack's business model would be negatively affected by user data mining. They operate on a "free for small hobbyist use, expensive for large corporate use". Corporations do not like when you mine their data and are generally able to do far more about it than average citizens. By default Slack's

Re: [racket-users] Re: Slack IRC bridge malfunctioning

2016-02-08 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Slack looks slightly better than the average dotcoms[*], but a skim of even their ToU shows what are likely showstoppers for a CIO or IT manager who does their due-diligence. Even moreso if you're not paying Slack, and may consequently have less legal standing, and no SLA.

Re: [racket-users] Re: Slack IRC bridge malfunctioning

2016-02-08 Thread Matthew Butterick
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 10:25:50 AM UTC-8, Jack Firth wrote: > Slack's business model would be negatively affected by user data mining. They > operate on a "free for small hobbyist use, expensive for large corporate > use". Corporations do not like when you mine their data and are