Le 17/07/2015 16:16, Matthias Felleisen a écrit :
This actually works. But I am not sure why you'd want to do something like that.
Ah yes, letrec is what I was looking for :) . The goal was to test a
port with a specific timeout (here I set it to two for dev purposes, but
10 is better). I
At Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:58:50 +0200, mazert wrote:
Le 17/07/2015 16:16, Matthias Felleisen a écrit :
This actually works. But I am not sure why you'd want to do something like
that.
Ah yes, letrec is what I was looking for :) . The goal was to test a
port with a specific timeout (here I
Le 17/07/2015 17:08, Matthew Flatt a écrit :
It's possible (but unlikely) for the thread bound to `a` to complete
and try to kill `b` before the variable `b` is initialized.
Ah ok, yes that is risky in this case, plus we didn't close the tcp
connection.
Here's what I'd do:
* Create a
Le 17/07/2015 17:06, George Neuner a écrit :
Won't the connection attempt eventually time out and cause an exception
when the TCP stack closes the socket? I know the default connect
timeout is rather long though (150 seconds?).
Yes it will close for sure but after a long time (maybe 150 sec
4 matches
Mail list logo
