Re: [racket-users] Scribbling documentation for a module beginning with _

Serves you well for writing Python names with Racket tools :-) > On Apr 14, 2017, at 4:50 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users > wrote: > > >> On Apr 14, 2017, at 6:05 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> >> I don't didn't find any other

Re: [racket-users] Scribbling documentation for a module beginning with _

> On Apr 14, 2017, at 6:05 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > I don't didn't find any other workaround. > > I think it makes no sense to treat an `_` prefix specially in > `defmodule`, `racketmodlink`, etc. (and it wasn't really a good idea > for `racket`), so I've pushed a

Re: [racket-users] Scribbling documentation for a module beginning with _

I don't didn't find any other workaround. I think it makes no sense to treat an `_` prefix specially in `defmodule`, `racketmodlink`, etc. (and it wasn't really a good idea for `racket`), so I've pushed a change to Scribble to disable `_` treatment in those forms. At Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:11:57

Re: [racket-users] Scribbling documentation for a module beginning with _

Oooh...that is an interesting case. FWIW, you could always cheat, and have the docs use a different name for the module for defmodule's, and manually typeset the correct name out. Its kind of a kludge though: ``` @defmodule[@racketmodfont{_-exp} #:module-paths (secret_-exp)

[racket-users] Scribbling documentation for a module beginning with _

I'm trying to write documentation for a module named _-exp, and I'm running into a problem because (I think) of the way underscores are treated by racketblock . Using