Re: Diffoscope 139 not on the website?

2020-04-07 Thread Santiago Torres
Thank you, Chris! I was able to pull and package for Arch now. -Santiago On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 04:39:14PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Santiago, > > > I've been waiting for Diffoscope 139 to make it to [1]. It's been a > > couple of days since it was tagged on the vcs, but it hasn't been signed

Re: Diffoscope 139 not on the website?

2020-04-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Santiago, > I've been waiting for Diffoscope 139 to make it to [1]. It's been a > couple of days since it was tagged on the vcs, but it hasn't been signed > and moved over there. Is this url not used anymore? This URL is still in use, it was just an omission when I was performing a release. I've

Diffoscope 139 not on the website?

2020-04-07 Thread Santiago Torres Arias
Hi, I've been waiting for Diffoscope 139 to make it to [1]. It's been a couple of days since it was tagged on the vcs, but it hasn't been signed and moved over there. Is this url not used anymore? Thanks, -Santiago [1] https://diffoscope.org/archive/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Please review the draft for March's report

2020-04-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-03/ Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please