On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 04:51:54PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > For "reproducible installation images", TAILS has shown this can be done
> > > today. Someone "just" needs to check the debian images and adopt the
> > > changes done in TAILS.
> >
> > Sounds like no one has taken on that work,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:27:08PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> [...] I mean, even if we
> had a tag cloud like we used to have [...]
can we have this back? iirc the old blog used ikiwiki and now we are
using jekyll but surely jekyll has this feature?
(we also had automated tagg
Hi David,
your simple question is not that simple... :)
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:42:08PM -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> > > If there's an estimated time of arrival that'd be awesome... is
> > > there one?
> > As I am sure you are aware Debian doesn't, generally speaking, work
> > on that
Hi Elio,
thank you very much for following up on this!
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 12:12:07AM +, Elio Qoshi wrote:
> As I see it right now, you might have more usage for an actual redesign help
> of the website, completely separate from the style guide.
yes!
> It would be good to know what
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > any objections to me enabling them? :)
> Yes and no. :)
:)
> As in; I have nothing against moving to salsa (!) if we go that route,
> we should just first firmly decide whether the BTS or salsa is the
> canonical source of truth.
I
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:19:46PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> My reading of this is that (ignoring Debian-specific issues as they
> are an "easy" case IMHO) salsa becomes the single source of truth; ie.
> we both encourage and at least aim to forward/refile all "upstream"
> bugs to Salsa.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 02:49:24PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> One thing to decide on would be what kind of file format to use.
while it is unfortunate that we will have many standards to choose from,
I think it's unavoidable.
> rfc822 is a bit foreign outside of Debian.
true that.
> I have
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:04:35PM +, Elio Qoshi wrote:
> Pantone are proprietary colors
yes, but they are also commonly used in print. no serious printshop
acccepts RGB colors, as they might look different depending on the media
etc.
(alternatives are RAL or HKS, there are no free
Hi Anxhelo,
thanks for your feedback! however...
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:07:04AM +, Anxhelo Lushka wrote:
> Here you have the conversion to RAL for the main colors:
> #1e5b96 --> RAL 5023
> #2b89d6 --> RAL 5012
actually I need them in pantone or HKS...
> You can also use
hi,
so, yes, we are planning to have reproducible builds t-shirt for the
summit, but those shirts will not be 'summit themed' and in genereal
are also available to (past & present) contributors who cannot make it
to the summit.
the shirt design is not finalized yet, but they will be printed on
Hi Elio,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 05:35:56PM +, Elio Qoshi wrote:
> I did some research myself on this and I'd suggest
>
> Primary:
> Pantone 647 C
>
> Secondary:
> Pantone 2727 C
>
great, thank you!
> Does that work?
pretty sure it will, will know on monday.
> Would you also like to
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:23:51PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> the shirt design is not finalized yet, but they will be printed on black
> cloth, with probably the logo without words on the front and the phrase
> (in big) "Provide a verifiable path from source code to binary.&quo
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 05:35:56PM +, Elio Qoshi wrote:
> Primary:
> Pantone 647 C
>
> Secondary:
> Pantone 2727 C
and added to git, visible at https://reproducible-builds.org/style/visuals/
thanks again!
--
cheers,
Holger
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> Buildinfo is more of a general concept rather than a well-defined
> specifciation,
> what it looks like exactly will probably vary per 'ecosystem'.
indeed. though we should have a specification about what .buildinfo file
Hi Elio,
the nice Reproducible Builds style guide has a section on colors, see
https://reproducible-builds.org/style/visuals/#colors - however these
are only RGB colors. For print (and in this case, specifically for
printing t-shirts) I need to specify them as Pantone colors (as in
Hi Jelle,
please excuse my late reply...!
On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 08:38:58PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> 1. Pacman
> 2. BUILDINFO
> 3. The repro tool
> 4. Reproducible Builds environment
> 5. Packaging
[...]
this is all wonderful information, thanks (again) for writing it up and
sharing
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:39:35PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Bit-for-bit reproducibility should be our goal, but it's not a _sine qua
> non_. In a pinch, out of pragmatism, one can get by with less. For
> example, if there were some binary package whose rebuilds are identical
> up to the
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 06:08:47PM -0500, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> FYI, the "legal-disc...@apache.org" mailing list is having an active
> discussion about doing reproducible builds for Apache Software Foundation
> (ASF) projects under the topic "RE: Binary channels". You can see that here:
>
Hi Marvin,
thanks for reaching out to us reproducible-builds.org folks!
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:10:44PM -0800, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Over on the legal-discuss list at the Apache Software Foundation, we are
> currently discussing reproducible builds.
>
>
Hi Nidhi,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:13:26PM +0530, nidhi kumari wrote:
> I'm Nidhi Kumari from India. I'm an outreachy 2019 aspirant. I wanted to
> contribute to Debian in Reproducible built projects. I'm experienced in
> python and a beginner in bash.
Welcome to Reproducible Builds & Debian &
Hi Kerlyn,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 06:30:40AM +0100, Nkep Kerlyn wrote:
> I am a Computer Engineer(Telecoms Major) from Buea, Cameroon. I recently
> completed undergraduate studies from the University of Buea.
nice, congrats!
> I am interested in contributing to the Debian community during and
Hi,
it's been some time... ;)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 07:27:31AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> David A. Wheeler wrote on Mon, 29 Oct 2018 06:22 -0400:
> > >I would skip the numbers or put them last in the news bit.
I'm working on something like this now, and hope to have it ready by tomorrow
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:57:21AM -0500, Omar Navarro Leija wrote:
> > when you say "reproducibly" here, do you mean 'repeatable'?
> I mean it in the same way as reproducible-builds.org, our research is
> largely inspired by the DRB effort!
oh, nice!
> Yeah... We plan to move up once the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:56:05AM -0500, Omar Navarro Leija wrote:
> I'm part of a team at UPenn researching tools for building package
> reproducibly. We use the Debian Apt Repo for our testing. Currently, we're
> verifying "correctness" for our builds, that is, does the package not only
>
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:42:58PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2018-10-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > Ok, I've found at least one package in the required set, with three
> > distinct .buildinfo files that converged on the same .deb:
> ...
> > We're now officially beyond mere theory!
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:48:46AM +0100, Eric Myhre wrote:
> The developer of Dwarf Fortress reported some "butterfly-effect style" bugs
> in deterministic world generation this week:
> http://www.bay12games.com/dwarves/#2019-02-21
> Reproducible builds: it's not just for compilers, it's for
hi,
disclaimer: this has not yet been verified by anyone other than myself,
so I could very well be wrong. Reproducible builds are about enabling
anyone to independently verify that... ;p
== Reproducibility in theory ==
According to
Hi John,
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 02:31:41PM -0800, John Gilmore wrote:
> > Though without solving #894441 we cannot reach much higher than 80%=20
> > (because 93% is the current theoretic maximum, of which we need to=20
> > distract 12% binNMUs...)
>
> Even without solving the general binNMU
Hi Bernhard,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:19:56PM +, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> On 23/10/2018 14.51, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> > How close is the core of Debian to being reproducibly built? By
> > core I mean the packages that you always have to install no matter
> > what.
>
>
Hi Anh,
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 08:16:06AM -0800, Anh Pham wrote:
> My name is Anh Pham and I am interested in contributing to Reproducible
> Builds project as an Outreachy applicant!
yay & welcome to Reproducible Builds & Debian & Outreachy & thank you
for your interest in contributing!
> May
Hi John,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:18:43PM -0800, John Gilmore wrote:
> =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= wrote:
> > I agree that insisting on provenance is crucial. Dockerfiles (andsimilar)
> > are often viewed as “source”, but they really aren’t source:the actual
> > source would come with
Hi Vagrant,
I've just been re-reading this old and joyful thread... :)
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:56:20PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I started the process of uploading all the .buildinfo files available on
> ftp.debian.org to buildinfo.debian.net.
>
> Then I hope to set up a cron job to
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:41:54PM +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> On 12/06/2019 15.07, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> > I'll also test a cross-ppc64le-gcc8 build to see if it behaves worse,
> > but would not expect so.
> For the record: the cross compilation was also reproducible (without
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 11:25:01AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> And this is done!
> If you are receiving this mail it means everything went well :)
yay, all is well :) (also confirmed in the headers..)
Thank you, Mattia for doing this move and many thanks to the fine folks
at potager.org for
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:46:33PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> there was a GSoC project for OpenWrt (maybe under the LEDE name back
> then) which was based on a similar idea: build software updates in the
> cloud and only packages which can be build reproducible on several
> nodes. I
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:01:16PM +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> > are there any plans to fix this and enable those macros? (eg a bug where
> > you track this.)
> opened one now:
> https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133809
yay!
> Thanks for the nudge.
thanks for biting! ;)
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:53:16PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> - https://buildinfos.debian.net - this service exist since March 2019
to expand on this:
provides two views:
https://buildinfos.debian.net/ftp-master.debian.org/buildinfo/ - this
has the same contents as /srv/ftp-master.debian.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 09:15:34PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
[packages uploaded before December 2016, which didnt see binNMU since
then, dont have a .buildinfo file (and were built with a dpkg which
produces unreproducible packages]
> So I guess after we release buster, we should do a
Hi David,
sorry for the delay in replying.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 11:25:25AM -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> The front page has this definition:
>
> > Reproducible builds are a set of software development practices that create
> > an independently-verifiable path from source to binary code.
Hi Arnout,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> I just wanted to share some promising progress around Reproducible
> Builds for Scala libraries (on the JVM).
>
> Recently the first non-trivial Scala library was released with my
> sbt-reproducible-builds plugin
Hi,
please note that https://buildinfos.debian.net/buildinfo-pool/ is
currently being recreated and thus not have all data again yet...
(I've added support for 3 (and more) .buildinfo files with the same
name and noticed that the numbered links were created in the wrong
order, thus the
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:43:11AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2019-04-29, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > It seems to be missing the .buildinfo.N, which in some cases are the
> > actual .buildinfo files built by the buildd's and the corresponding .deb
> > files shipped in the archive.
> >
>
Hi Nico,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:22:59AM +0200, Nico Alt wrote:
> some months ago, I had the pleasure to write an article about
> reproducible builds and how they get used at F-Droid. Two weeks ago,
> this article got published in c't, a major German computer magazine:
>
>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> So should we standardise on "unreproducible" and "nondeterministic" ?
yes, please.
> The other question would be British or American English?
> or we dont care...
i'd almost say the latter.
--
tschau,
Holger
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:27:02AM -0300, Chris Lamb wrote:
> So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> was thus wondering whether we could apply my patch from:
> https://bugs.debian.org/926242#127
https://bugs.debian.org/926242#117 makes me think this is not to be
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:47:34AM -0300, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> > > was thus wondering whether we could apply my patch from:
> […]
> > https://bugs.debian.org/926242#117 makes me think this is not to be
> > applied against
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:17:53PM -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> > It might be non-obvious from where those copies are coming from, or IOW
> > that the hashes of these sources are part of the build instructions.
> I don't think that should be specified in the definition.
> It shouldn't matter
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:47:42AM -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> Done!
> https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/merge_requests/31
cool, thank you.
> Who is in favor?
that's exactly why I'm not merging this, I want other people agreeing
this change is good & what we
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 02:31:49PM +, Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB) wrote:
> > thanks. whats knight? :)
> Knight is an ancient 16/32/64bit Big Endian architecture which can be
> implemented in TTL
> https://github.com/oriansj/stage0/blob/master/ISA_HEX_Map.org#instruction-listing
>
> The
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 01:49:19PM +, Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB) wrote:
> > neato & thanks for sharing. what are those 5 architectures? looking *very
> > briefly* add the above two URLs I couldnt figure it out...
> Knight-native
> Knight-Posix
> ARM (v6+v7)
> X86
> AMD64
thanks. whats knight?
Hi David,
thanks for persisting on this. Directly commenting on your proposal:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:03:18PM -0400, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> A build is reproducible if given the same source code, build environment,
> and build instructions, any party can independently verify all specified
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [I'm not subscribed, so please cc me if you reply.]
ack.
> I added a document to the Linux source about how to make it build
> reproducibly, based on what we've done in the Debian package:
>
Hi,
as some have noticed via the git commits, preparations for the 5th Reproducible
Builds Summit 2019 in Marrakesh have begun.
Please go to https://reproducible-builds.org/events/Marrakesh2019/ and read on
there, the format will (probably) slightly change...!
And, also, *please*, don't yet
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 03:59:01AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'd like many of you to answer this little poll, by directly replying to
> me.
forgot to mention: the idea is to publish the poll results in roughly 2 weeks
and then also (hopefully) finalize dates and location, so you ca
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 05:55:43PM -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> Over in Arch Linux we have opted instead to disable seccomp in file(1)
> entirely -- it completely breaks common workflows that require looking at
> files, and there's no way an application can actually know how to make it
> work.
hi,
I've started to upgrade our testnodes hosted at OSUOSL to Debian Buster,
which translates to these nodes with these purposes.
osuosl167 (http-proxy for osuosl nodes)
osuosl168 (r-b F-Droid builds)
osuosl169 (r-b Archlinux builds)
osuosl170 (r-b Archlinux builds)
osuosl171 (r-b OpenWrt,
heya,
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 10:35:51PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> https://reproducible-builds.org/events/Marrakesh2019/ has more
> information about the event.
this page now also has information about alternative housing options
near by.
currently we still have 18 beds ava
Hi Omar,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Omar Navarro Leija wrote:
> Thank you everyone for their feedback. Sounds good. I will work on a draft
> of our paper that we can share with people interested. I will report back
> to my lab and see about coming!
cool, looking forward to hear
Hi Omar, hi Kelly,
thanks a lot for reaching out and please excuse the/my small delay in
replying.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 06:13:59PM -0400, Omar Navarro Leija wrote:
> We are both doctoral students at the University Of Pennsylvania. We are
> part of a collaboration between UPenn and University
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:05:32AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> bbc3bf37 by Chris Lamb at 2019-09-23T09:04:49Z
> Misc æsthetic cleanups to homepage.
[...]
> +([See all]({{ "/news/" | prepend: site.baseurl }}))
and
> +([See all]({{ "/news/" | prepend: site.baseurl }}))
first off, thanks for
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 12:18:59PM +, Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB) wrote:
> I am proud to announce the release of mescc-tools-seed v1.1
> https://github.com/oriansj/mescc-tools-seed
>
> Capable of bootstrapping from a simple hex assembler all the way to a
> cross-platform C compiler (M2-Planet)
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 06:50:09PM +0100, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that today I released 3 base Maven plugins (source, jar
> and assembly) to get Reproducible Builds as direct Maven build output: see
> "Configuring for Reproducible Builds" documentation [1] for more details
Hi,
(changed to: to debian-devel, added the r-b general list as cc: and bcc:ed
Niko and Guillem.)
the following came up in "#791362: perl: build timezone affects
LOCALTIME_{MIN,MAX}":
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:00:15PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:28:32PM +0100, Guillem
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 11:57:38AM -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> > wow, cool, that might be something for Archlinux...!
> I don't believe this is related to us as we (per policy) try to avoid
> using pip to install packages. Our solution to a package being
> unreproducible because it uses pip's
hi,
if you have registered for
https://reproducible-builds.org/events/Marrakesh2019/
you have been subscribed to an summit internal mailinglist, which is
used solely for logistics for the summit.
If you have not seen these mails, you are not registered for the summit,
though you can still do
Hi Bernhard,
many thanks for this detailed summary. I've added a summary and a link to
the monthly report..
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 04:31:29PM +0100, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> In my reproducibleopensuse repo, I added
>
>
Hi Janneke,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the release of GNU Mes 0.21, representing
> 54 commits over 10 weeks.
[...]
very cool! (& I've added it to our monthly report.)
--
cheers,
Holger
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:21:45PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> As some background, I actually deliberately merged the two pages as they
> kind of have the same role and it was yet another navigation item
agreed
> - {% for post in site.posts limit: 5 %}
> + {% for post in site.posts %}
>
> ...
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I see and share this sentiment, so why not bump the limit instead of
> removing it entirely? I would agree that the older entries are a little
> dated.
what number would you suggest? I'd suggest something like 15 (and not
less or
On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 10:53:24AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Now it seems that the problem is in the man pages of the program [2].
> pyfai generates its man pages, with help2man.
that's probably
Hi Bernhard,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> TLDR:
> The goal of reproducible builds is to reduce the likelyhood of running
> software that was corrupted (during build)
>
>
> At https://etherpad.opensuse.org/p/reproduciblebuilds-goal
> I added a small
Hi Jeremiah,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:38:41AM +, Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB) wrote:
> Today I am pleased to announce the following releases:
> https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/stage0/
> https://github.com/oriansj/stage0
> https://github.com/oriansj/M2-Planet
>
Hi Omar,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 05:14:00PM -0500, Omar Navarro Leija wrote:
> It was great meeting so many people at the Reproducible Builds Summit 2019!
indeed & thank you again for contributing to it!
> Our publication "Reproducible Containers" will be presented in March at
> ASPLOS 2020.
Hi Vagrant,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:08:59PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I did some quick reproducibility testing running GNU Guix, and so far
> got pretty good results:
>
> Using guix (and packages) built from commit:
> f83d07f7778b699d46741a5667113342f5f0a737
>
> $ guix challenge
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 01:35:13PM -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> I'd personally be happy to see more of this as part of debootstrap
> itself, but from what I've seen debootstrap isn't very actively
> maintained these days (which is understandable, given that for the
> purposes of things like d-i,
hi,
as you might have noticed, ReproBird, our friendly irc bot relaying
messages concerning reproducible builds from twitter and also allowing
us to post there, is down.
Lunar, who thankfully has been operating it for many years, couldnt get
it to restart again (it now just eats memory until it
Hi Bernhard,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:47:38PM +, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> As discussed on the last summit in Marrakesh, I made a working draft for
> https://ismypackagereproducibleyet.org/
wow, that's super awesome!
long term (or sooner) we should think how to integrate this into
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 09:39:35PM +0200, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> one week later, here is the result: we are at 97%
> 85 sub projects on 87 have reproducible builds
> https://github.com/jvm-repo-rebuild/reproducible-maven-HEAD
> isn't it great?
wow, very neat! kudos! (& thanks for sharing this
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 02:06:03PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report:
> https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-03/?draft
looks good to me, thanks!
--
cheers,
Holger
HiHervé,
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 06:33:12PM +0100, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> I'd like to announce a new important step for Reproducible Builds for the JVM:
> reproducible-central.
>
> The intent is to provide easy to run reproducible recipes, to let anyone
> rebuild a component from Central
Hi Omar,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:55:27AM -0400, Omar Navarro Leija wrote:
> Here is the 20 minute presentation of our Reproducible Containers project.
> It is a lot more bite-size than the paper :3
> https://youtu.be/NuDIZqBdM08
I get 'this video has been removed by the uploader' - do you
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:16:47AM -0400, Omar Navarro Leija wrote:
> Sorry about that. The sound setting where off in the original video so they
> had to reupload the video. The new (and hopefully permanent link) can be
> found here: https://youtu.be/YkmS-vf12nE
thanks! downloading now, to watch
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-03-29, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > I'm just writing to let you know that the link to weekly news at the
> > sidebar of https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.html
> > is now broken. It still uses the old
hi,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:05:42PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> as you might have noticed, ReproBird, our friendly irc bot relaying
> messages concerning reproducible builds from twitter and also allowing
> us to post there, is down.
>
> Lunar, who thankfully has been operat
hi Hans,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:55:39AM +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Guardian Project currently working making translation of Markdown-based
> websites work much better, particularly focused on Weblate as the
> translation platform. If people thought it was a good idea, we could
>
hi,
i'm just replying to two small sub points here, I still need to find
the time for a proper general reply. (Besides: YAY, I'm glad we're
finally having this discussion here and several proposals to discuss!)
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:31:21PM +, kpcyrd wrote:
> The buildinfo is an output
Dear Chris,
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:58:03PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> The diffoscope maintainers are please to announce the release of
> version 145 of diffoscope.
\o/
> diffoscope tries to get to the bottom of what makes files or
> directories different. [...]
> Version 145 includes the
Dear Chris,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 12:02:03PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> (As an obiter dictum, are we sure it was Holger who was proposing this
> idea in the talk, rather than mentioning it? I think he has previously
> echoed my view on the "no special tools" principle, hence this minor
>
hi,
so we had our first IRC meeting and 12 people participated, yay!
The automated summary is at
http://meetbot.debian.net/reproducible-builds/2020/reproducible-builds.2020-10-12-17.58.html
we had two action items:
- vagrant will provide a summary of the brainstorming topic
- sangy or
hi,
just a small reminder...
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:03:11AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> this is a reminder for our IRC meeting in three days:
> Monday, the 12th of October
> at 18:00 UTC
> on #reproducible-builds on irc.oftc.net
> the agenda
hi,
not to surprise anyone, we have decided to formally announce that there will
be no Reproducible Builds Summit in 2020, also no online event.
We hope to have a Reproducible Builds Summit in 2021 but won't start
thinking about it before 2021 neither. We'll see how things are in half
a year or
hi,
a small typo correction:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 04:53:53PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Monday, the 12th of October
> at 18:00 UTC
> on #reproducible-builds on irc.ofct.net
irc.oftc.net is correct
> the agenda is
5:04:57PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> so some of us have come to agree that we would like to resume regular
> irc meetings about reproducible builds.
>
> we propose to generally have general meetings, not specific to any distro,
> which should act as coordination type meetings, whe
hi,
so some of us have come to agree that we would like to resume regular
irc meetings about reproducible builds.
we propose to generally have general meetings, not specific to any distro,
which should act as coordination type meetings, where people can share
news, bring up topics and ask for
hi,
this is a reminder for tomorrow's meeting:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 04:31:16PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> The next meeting will take place on:
> Monday, the 26th of October
> at 18:00 UTC
> on #reproducible-builds on irc.oftc.net
> the agenda
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Afaik only Holger has access to the DNS management interface (including
> payments, renewal, etc) at Gandi.
not according to the Gandi (I just logged in and checked) and 'whois
diffoscope.org'
returns NS1.POTAGER.ORG as
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:12:06PM +0300, Anatoli Babenia wrote:
> As for the DNS issue, it looks like the domain expired.
thankfully this has been fixed by Lunar now.
--
cheers,
Holger
---
Dear Chris,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 10:54:34AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for June's Reproducible Builds report:
> https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-06/?draft
looks good to me, thank you for your tireless work on the reports!
--
cheers,
Holger
hi,
this is a reminder for our IRC meeting in 49h:
Monday, the 23rd of November 2020,
at 18:00 UTC
on #reproducible-builds on irc.oftc.net
the agenda is at
https://pad.sfconservancy.org/p/reproducible-builds-meeting-agenda
Currently the agenda is rather empty,
hi,
this is a reminder for our IRC meeting in 5h:
today, Monday, 7th of December 2020,
at 18:00 UTC
on #reproducible-builds on irc.oftc.net
the agenda is at
https://pad.sfconservancy.org/p/reproducible-builds-meeting-agenda
Currently the agenda is rather empty,
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
