Johnathan Rockind said:
This seems like a perfectly reasonable and good solution to me,
On Jun 29, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Adam L. Schiff wrote:
I think from our discussion on this matter is that RDA needs
another element to record what I will call the linking word or
term in the title.
How does
It does not differ, it is the same semantic content. Surely, RDA and
MARC need to be compatible. Just as both need to be compatible with
ISBD, if the ISBD elements are still important. And just as both need
to be compatible with FRBR, if the FRBR model is important. (I
realize there is some
Jonathan Rochkind said:
It does not differ, it is the same semantic content. Surely, RDA and
MARC need to be compatible. Just as both need to be compatible with
ISBD, if the ISBD elements are still important.
Total agreement here.
But RDA needs to be expressed in language other than MARC.
3 matches
Mail list logo