Re: linking word element needed

2007-07-01 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Johnathan Rockind said: This seems like a perfectly reasonable and good solution to me, On Jun 29, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Adam L. Schiff wrote: I think from our discussion on this matter is that RDA needs another element to record what I will call the linking word or term in the title. How does

Re: linking word element needed

2007-07-01 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
It does not differ, it is the same semantic content. Surely, RDA and MARC need to be compatible. Just as both need to be compatible with ISBD, if the ISBD elements are still important. And just as both need to be compatible with FRBR, if the FRBR model is important. (I realize there is some

Language of RDA

2007-07-01 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Jonathan Rochkind said: It does not differ, it is the same semantic content. Surely, RDA and MARC need to be compatible. Just as both need to be compatible with ISBD, if the ISBD elements are still important. Total agreement here. But RDA needs to be expressed in language other than MARC.