16.04.2011 21:01, Mark Ehlert:
The question then becomes whether there is a need to differentiate
between brackets used with cataloger interpolations versus those
transcribed from the source. In MARC--short of developing a
MARC-specific code or punctuated phrase of some kind, e.g.,[...] or
Mary Charles,
Since no one yet has tried to give an explanation, and without searching
through all of the JSC minutes, where it can probably be found, I think
the short answer is that they wanted just one rule to cover both
conferences, congresses, meetings, etc. and exhibitions, festivals,
I am out of the office from Mon 04/18/2011 until Thu 04/28/2011.
Ég verð fjarverandi til 28. apríl, hef samband þegar ég kem til baka
Adam,
Thanks.
Do you think that decision could be reconsidered, given the implications for
'access' and RDA maintenance/fallout? It seems the 'bulk' of the current
authority records/headings are for conference names. I've created a few of the
others, but rarely. The less problematic change
Dear Mary Charles.
I can confirm Adam's response. RDA merged separate AACR2 instructions relating
to conferences, congresses, meetings, exhibitions and fairs into a single
instruction: 11.2.2.11. As a consequence of this change, frequency is retained
in the name of a conference (AACR2
Danskin, Alan wrote:
snip
Treating events consistently is a simplification of the instructions. The
decision to include frequency in the name of the event is justified by the
principle of representation if the event represents itself as an Annual
Conference or the Biennial Festival.
/snip
I
Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
16.04.2011 21:01, Mark Ehlert:
The question then becomes whether there is a need to differentiate
between brackets used with cataloger interpolations versus those
transcribed from the source. In MARC--short of developing a
MARC-specific code or punctuated
Kevin Randall asked:
question is about how to distinguish one use of a character (identifying
data supplied by the cataloger) from another use of a character
(transcription of what is on the resource).
That was the question I asked.
It seemed to me that in 245$a (and 490?) the distinction is
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Kevin M. Randall k...@northwestern.edu wrote:
I think the nonsorting control character is an entirely separate issue.
Then what would be your suggestion?
For ages, we have used the non-sort control characters in addition to
square brackets
to indicate parts of
Only catalogers? The ISSN authority considers them to be different too,
changing the title like that gets you a new ISSN. Note the different
ISSNs at each point monthly and/or the was added/removed.
The Atlantic 1072-7825
Former titles (until 1993): Atlantic (United States) (0276-9077)
(until
For more than a decade, the JSC, the ISSN Network, and IFLA's ISBD Review Group
have tried to harmonize their rules for what constitutes a major change in a
serial title. If you make a proposal for latest entry cataloging to one of the
groups, they will say it can't be done because you need
A change in the first few words of the title of a serial has always been, and
under RDA still is, a reason for a new bibliographic record. We have seen the
problems arising from collating all titles under their current ISSN, when
online archives displayed the current title on an historical
Mary Charles,
I think what will happen in RDA is that we will create authority records
for each conference, rather than one record to represent the continuing
conference.
Adam
^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box
Adam L. Schiff asch...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I think what will happen in RDA is that we will create authority records for
each conference, rather than one record to represent the continuing
conference.
Though there are scattered references to series of conferences, etc.
in RDA, e.g.,
Applying conference rules to festivals, fairs, exhibitions, etc. simply
will not work, because many of them have names such as:
Artists Biennial
Biennale di Venezia
Bienal Internacional de Arte
Asia Triennial Manchester
Chapungu Annual
Cape Town Triennial
Prague Quadrennial
On 18/04/2011 19:34, Adam L. Schiff wrote:
snip
I think you are right, but then our patrons will demand that somehow, these
separate conferences all come together. People have plenty of problems already
with conferences--one of the worst is the idea that it is a conference *name*
and not a
Of course, in all those examples the frequency word is used as a noun and not
an adjective, so it couldn't be omitted. The rule could have been revised to
omit adjectival frequency words.
--
John Hostage
Authorities and Database Integrity Librarian
The agenda for the BIBCO and CONSER Operations Committees meeting in May
is now posted at
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/bibco/BIBCOOpCo2011Agenda.html Document 1
under the agenda item Overview of RDA PCC Policy and Practice Decisions
for PCC includes several discussion items related to
Quoting Mark Ehlert ehler...@umn.edu:
Adam L. Schiff asch...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I think what will happen in RDA is that we will create authority records for
each conference, rather than one record to represent the continuing
conference.
Though there are scattered references to series of
As far as I am concerned, re-catalog conference proceedings from monograph
to serials is a good judgment call if you consider the following scenarios:
1. how proceedings are being processed, published, linked, etc. at
individual conference event level by publishers and learned societies
Dear Sara:
Thank you so much for the correction. It is actually about re-cataloging
from **serial** to **monograph*.*
Amanda
Amanda Xu
Collection Management Librarian for Information Technology
James E. Walker Library
Middle Tennessee
21 matches
Mail list logo
