Did we ever figure out the difference of when we use three-dimensional form
vs. tactile three-dimensional form?
I would say that most three-dimensional forms can be touched, so there is a
tactile component to them, as three-dimensional forms.
Of course, for some things, it is clearly not the
John
I was just reading up this thread and waiting for someone to point that
out. Russia (Federation) and Russia, Federation are both wrong, in
authority 370 in LC/NAF.
This follows the LCPS for 11.3.1 (Do not include the type of
jurisdiction), which can also be applied to 9.8.1.3, 9.9.1.3 and
I think the clearest definition for when tactile is used is found in the note
in the RDA-ONIX Framework document for sensory modes (which include touch as
one of the means by which the content of a resources is intended to be
perceived).
http://www.loc.gov/marc/marbi/2007/5chair10.pdf
John
I was just reading up this thread and waiting for someone to point that
out. Russia (Federation) and Russia, Federation are both wrong, in
authority 370 in LC/NAF.
This follows the LCPS for 11.3.1 (Do not include the type of
jurisdiction), which can also be applied to 9.8.1.3, 9.9.1.3 and
The web interface for controlling your RDA-L subscription options is available
at:
https://listserv.collectionscanada.gc.ca/cgi-bin/wa?A0=RDA-L
As with other web interfaces, you will need to set up your own password, etc.
RDA-L is archived at:
I agree with Thomas' assessment here. And to provide another example, while globes are all three-dimensional and tactile in the sense that one can or may touch them, there are globes out there that are designed to be tactile in nature in that, e.g., the continents are raised in such a way that
Thomas,
So you would not consider either brain to be tactile, because the main
intention is for it to be seen?
336 three-dimensional form ǂ2 rdacontent
Best wishes,
Julie Moore
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Brenndorfer, Thomas
tbrenndor...@library.guelph.on.ca wrote:
I think the
I think in your wording the main intention for the plastic brain model is for
people to “see” how the pieces fit together. And seeing in three-dimensions at
that, which suggests some movement or action on the part of the observer to see
all sides of the object—all of these other actions, such
Hi, again, Bob.
So then, is it also
$b some color illustrations or $b illustrations (some color)
and
$b chiefly color illustrations or $b illustrations (chiefly
color) ... ?
In the first example, the statement on the left, as a user, I would read
this grammatically
As far as I am concerned, tactile is only one type of the Sensory Mode
(a.k.a. touch).
The scope of human sensory mode defined in RDA-ONIX Framework needs to be
updated to include signal or stimulus that causes the change of the
intellectual content because of human motion and gesture. An
Julie Moore asked:
Did we ever figure out the difference of when we use three-dimensional form
vs. tactile three-dimensional form?
Aren't all forms both three dimensional and tactile? Whose phrases
are too long for convenient display. The MRIs suggest just using
form.
If using the long
The definition for *tactile three dimensional form* is *Content expressed
through a form or forms intended to be perceived through touch as a
three-dimensional form or forms*.
My understanding is that the definition covers at least the core content
instead of a part of content. If a part of
For many of the special formats materials that I catalog, there is often
accompanying material -- a CD-ROM, a DVD, a guide, a cassette, etc.
The last I looked, there was no new way of dealing with accompanying
material, and RDA had not spoken to it. So are we supposed to just keep
adding these
Please could someone let us know what we are supposed to do with the
accompanying material? I am glad I am not the only one with this problem.
Jinny Wesson
Library Resource Center
Library Coordinator
Technical Services/Cataloging
3000 NE 4th St.
Renton, WA 98056
(425) 235-2331
The last I looked, there was no new way of dealing with accompanying material,
and RDA had not spoken to it. So are we supposed to just keep adding these
accompanying materials pieces as a 300 $e?
And dare we use that mysterious and confounding +? I'm asssuming that when
the accompanying
Refer to LC/PCC PS 3.1.4
Lots of examples given.
336, 337,338 can be repeated. See MARC 21 for Bibliographic Records for
examples. If the accompanying material differs, use separate 33x's where
applicable.
See also the LC Training Materials, Module 1.
Please excuse cross-postings.
ALCTS- CaMMS Cataloging Norms Interest Group invites speakers to participate at
the ALCTS- CaMMS CNIG session, ALA Midwinter Meeting in Seattle on Saturday,
Jan. 26, 2013 at 10:30-11:30 AM.
The mission of the CaMMS Cataloging Norms Interest Group is to offer a
Matthew,
You are correct that some color illustrations and illustrations (some
color) mean different things, as do chiefly color illustrations and
illustrations (chiefly color). In RDA some color is a separate element from
illustrations so if we were just recording elements in a cataging form
The main source for instructions about accompanying material in RDA is at RDA
3.1.4 (Resources Consisting of More than One Carrier Type).
The scope of this section, RDA 3.1.4, is for resources that consist of more
than one Carrier Type. A collection of objects (object being the sole Carrier
Do you recommend recording the 336, 337, and 338 of the accompanying
material as well as those fields for the main work?
Julie
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Julie Moore
julie.renee.mo...@gmail.comwrote:
For many of the special formats materials that I catalog, there is often
accompanying
There is an alternative instruction for Carrier Type (RDA 3.3) where only the
carrier type for the predominant part or most substantial parts of the resource
need be recorded. But the main instruction is to record as many terms as are
applicable to the resource being described.
If a different
The definition for *tactile three dimensional form* is *Content expressed
through a form or forms intended to be perceived through touch as a
three-dimensional form or forms*.
U was taught that definitions should not contain the word(s) being
defined. I hope definitions will be among the
Julie Moore asked:
The last I looked, there was no new way of dealing with accompanying
material, and RDA had not spoken to it. So are we supposed to just keep
adding these accompanying materials pieces as a 300 $e?
We would add an 007, and additional 336, 337, and 338 as required,
with $3 for
23 matches
Mail list logo
