Hi, all
I have a question about recoding a title proper of a part of resource and
the larger resource for an analytical description.
RDA 1.5.3, types of description, shows that the larger resource may be
recorded in a series statement, related work, or related manifestation.
When using an
Hi everyone,
I've searched the list and couldn't find if these questions had been asked
before so here goes.
1. We are cataloging a Great Courses DVD and course guide. We have the
lecturer and course guide author in the 100 field. What should his relator term
be? Is $e creator
How about written and narrated by?
Jinny Wesson
Library Resource Center
Library Coordinator
Technical Services/Cataloging
3000 NE 4th St.
Renton, WA 98056
(425) 235-2331
jwes...@rtc.edu mailto:jwes...@rtc.edu
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
Stephen Early asked:
And whether I like it or not, RDA treats the microfilm as the
manifestation on which I must base my description. Since you've
been going through RDA longer than I have*, I would be interested in
your comments/justifications.
The short answer is I don't. RDA has WEMI;
Sommer Browning said:
1. We are cataloging a Great Courses DVD and course guide. We have th=
e lecturer and course guide author in the 100 field. What should his relato=
r term be?
I suspect we would consider the lecturer to be just one contributor to
something having mixed
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Browning, Sommer
[sommer.brown...@ucdenver.edu]
Sent: April-05-13 5:21 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as
6 matches
Mail list logo
