Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?

J. McRee (Mac) Elrod wrote: By definition isn't any person, body, or family in 1XX a creator? As I understand it, there is no logical link in RDA between entities considered as creators (i.e., entities which can take relators from the creator list in Appendix I) and entities which can be the

Re: [RDA-L] Using 344-347?

Thanks to everyone who advised about 34X use, and apologies for delayed thanks - I was waiting to see if there were any different strategy suggestions. We'll assess how much 34X work could be covered by templates and fixes and how much it would add to work on individual records before deciding

[RDA-L] Punctuation for editions in access points

Good morning, I'm hoping for some guidance on how to handle edition information that's included in an access point. Specifically, although RDA contains plenty on edition statements, it never addresses whether an edition in an access point is included with or without parentheses. For

Re: [RDA-L] Relator term for as told to (RDA-L(#2013-110)

Quoting J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca: Then there are spirit writings and compositions; another version of as told to? Oh, dear. Now I'll be waiting to see $echanneller. (Kidding, honest!) The complexity of the bibliographic world does not fit neatly into a finite predetermined set of

Re: [RDA-L] Relator term for as told to (RDA-L(#2013-110)

On 06/05/2013 15:27, Nancy Braman wrote: snip Quoting J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca: The complexity of the bibliographic world does not fit neatly into a finite predetermined set of terms. True; and it seems to be getting more complex all the time. /snip Yes. There is another aspect to this

Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?

-Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod Sent: May-06-13 1:12 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?

Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?

That depends on whether 'The director's event' is to be considered a compilation of works by different persons, etc. (6.27.1.4) or a collaborative work (6.27.1.3). I think it's the latter, so the first-named of those creators would be used in the AAP.

[RDA-L] Question on date index

Hi, -This is a general question- I would like to know on which subfield/s is you date index based on. I think it should be based on 008/07-10 ; 11-14 and not on 260$c and 264$c but our ILS provider says that it is not possible. Here is the explanation. It is mentioned that most sites

Re: [RDA-L] Relator term

Nancy Braman said: The complexity of the bibliographic world does not fit neatly into a finite predetermined set of terms. True; and it seems to be getting more complex all the time. Appropriate $4codes or $eterms are lacking for some non complex situations, e.g., 111 conference heading for

Re: [RDA-L] Relator term

The complexity and contiguity of the universe in general does not conform very well to static, controlled lists. This includes not only relationships but also names of things and people, abstractions and topics, and pretty much everything catalogers see fit to record and use as a 'controlled