Hi, All
I hope that somebody would like to help me understand authorized access
points for expressions.
We can say that authorized access points for expressions are not separate
access points. They are actually expression elements such as content type,
date, and language, added to authorized
(Forgot to put subject in the earlier email I sent. Sorry about that)
Hi, All
I hope that somebody would like to help me understand authorized access
points for expressions.
We can say that authorized access points for expressions are not separate
access points. They are actually expression
n 79084797.
Haggadah English has a see-reference from Haggadah English Hebrew.
When this record hit our database, it turned all the entries for Haggadah
English Hebrew into entries for Haggadah English.
I then went through and added the extra entry for Haggadah Hebrew. (hm...
that may
130 0#$aGone with the wind (Motion picture).$hSound recording.
I think that for this, should use Performed music in $h?
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Joan Wang jw...@illinoisheartland.orgwrote:
(Forgot to put subject in the earlier email I sent. Sorry about that)
Hi, All
I hope that
This very matter has been the subject of more than one e-mail to what I can
only refer to as offenders. In our current wild-West
everyone-does-what-they-want world I doubt that anything except eternal
vigilance on all of our parts can prevent this kind of improper behavior from
adversely
Next! ;)
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Gary L Strawn
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 11:10 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] English Hebrew -- English.. a taste of things to come?
Just looked at record:
n 79084797
040 DLC ǂb eng ǂe rda ǂc DLC ǂd OCoLC ǂd OrU ǂd DLC ǂd ICrlF
130 0Haggadah. ǂl English
377 eng
430 0Haggadah. ǂl English Hebrew ǂw nnaa
4102 Jews. ǂk Liturgy and ritual. ǂt Hagadah. ǂl English Hebrew ǂw nnaa
430 0New American Haggadah
670 New American
Well, what you need to end up with is indeed two 7XX fields for most such
headings. (I'm going to set aside the matter of bilingual series such as … $t
Works. $l English Latin.) One of the difficulties one faces involves the two
languages named in the $l: is one of them the original?
And then we have the following already in the NAF:
010 n 84075772
040 InU ǂb eng ǂc DLC ǂd DLC ǂd UPB ǂd DLC
046 ǂk 1976 ǂl 1977
1000 Origen. ǂt Homilies on Jeremiah. ǂl French Greek
336 text ǂ2 rdacontent
4000 Origen. ǂt Homélies sur Jérémie
667 THIS 1XX FIELD CANNOT BE USED UNDER RDA
The series dilemma for parallel titles has turned into a PCC policy discussion.
As it stands and as you are instructed in the series bridge training, you have
to create TWO series records. One for each language expression. Even though
neither SAR completely describes the work if you do that.
Jenifer Marquardt wrote:
The series dilemma for parallel titles has turned into a PCC policy
discussion. As it stands and as you are instructed in the series bridge
training, you have to create TWO series records. One for each language
expression. Even though neither SAR completely
Joan is correct that Performed music would be the term added for an expression
of a score but this is not how the access point for the music from the film
would be constructed. It would be the name of the composer followed by the
name of the musical work. The music is a separate work from the
So, Gary, what is the proper behavior with these records in the authority file?
--
John Hostage
Authorities and Database Integrity Librarian //
Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services //
Langdell Hall 194 //
Cambridge, MA 02138
Since there's no one-for-one correspondence, I think the best thing is just to
delete 'em. I'd be delighted if they were all deleted in a batch…
Gary L. Strawn, Authorities Librarian, etc. Twitter: GaryLStrawn
Northwestern University Library, 1970 Campus Drive, Evanston IL 60208-2300
Delete what? The authority record(s)?
Examples, please
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Gary L Strawn mrsm...@northwestern.eduwrote:
Since there's no one-for-one correspondence, I think the best thing is
just to delete 'em. I'd be delighted if they were all deleted in a batch…*
***
** **
Each of these types of authority records for expressions with multiple
languages needs to result in two or more new authority records, with the
original record cancelled (it could be put in 040 $z of the new RDA
records, but Coop Team personnel would have to do that, since we can't add
040 $z
Hello All,
In July of 2012 PSD issued guidelines described the changes made in Phase 1 and
provided guidance for NACO handling of NARs that had the 667 added to it. This
document is at: http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/lcnaf_rdaphase.pdf
See page 4, number 3 that states:
AACR2 authority record
Anne,
NLM has created a number of streaming video records using RDA. We are not
finding that they are any more difficult in RDA than they were in AACR2. For
some samples you can search these NLMID numbers in either OCLC or NLM's
18 matches
Mail list logo