Please forgive the duplication, but I think this question is relevant to all
three lists.
It seems to be the consensus that under RDA, when one has a translation, one
should not only indicate this in terms of the preferred title (130 or 240), but
also by the addition of a 765 field, in MARC.
I routinely catalog resources like this and I can't recall ever having seen any
records using 765 for this situation, so I don't think it can be said there is
a consensus for adding a 765 field under RDA for translations.
The current practice is to use 1XX/240 if there is one work or expression
Hi, everyone;
Here is something I have not thought over until now.
I am adding a quoted note 500 in an imported copycat bib. I would normally
attribute it thus:
--T. p. verso
Well, no abbrevations, so Title page verso. But, we are avoiding the Latin
terms in RDA as often as poss., correct?
I think everyone is still using “verso” and “recto” if appropriate. I wouldn’t
try to find a replacement term in this case.
Adam Schiff
University of Washington Libraries
From: Karen Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:55 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] title page
Karen Nelson said:
Title page verso. But, we are avoiding the Latin = terms in RDA as
often as possible.
The borrowed terms verso and recto are universal enough IMNSHO to
be used in notes, along with i.e. and e.g.. I agree that you
should spell out Title page; T.p. is less well known.
Even my
Karen said,
But, we are avoiding the Latin terms in RDA as often as poss., correct?
Verso is a perfectly good English word, which you can find in any
decent dictionary. Granted, it's a loan word from Latin. But so is
title and page (which I assume were brought to the English language
via
The 765 field is generally used to link *separate resources* that are specific
manifestations containing different language expressions of the same work. In
the case of a Loeb edition, there isn't really another specific manifestation
that this is related to-i.e., considered a translation of
7 matches
Mail list logo