[RDA-L] 765 note again ((not-quite-so) hypothetical)

2013-10-22 Thread Michael Borries
Please forgive the duplication, but I think this question is relevant to all three lists. It seems to be the consensus that under RDA, when one has a translation, one should not only indicate this in terms of the preferred title (130 or 240), but also by the addition of a 765 field, in MARC.

Re: [RDA-L] 765 note again ((not-quite-so) hypothetical)

2013-10-22 Thread Robert Maxwell
I routinely catalog resources like this and I can't recall ever having seen any records using 765 for this situation, so I don't think it can be said there is a consensus for adding a 765 field under RDA for translations. The current practice is to use 1XX/240 if there is one work or expression

[RDA-L] title page verso in 500 note

2013-10-22 Thread Karen Nelson
Hi, everyone; Here is something I have not thought over until now. I am adding a quoted note 500 in an imported copycat bib. I would normally attribute it thus: --T. p. verso Well, no abbrevations, so Title page verso. But, we are avoiding the Latin terms in RDA as often as poss., correct?

Re: [RDA-L] title page verso in 500 note

2013-10-22 Thread Adam Schiff
I think everyone is still using “verso” and “recto” if appropriate. I wouldn’t try to find a replacement term in this case. Adam Schiff University of Washington Libraries From: Karen Nelson Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:55 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] title page

Re: [RDA-L] title page verso in 500 note

2013-10-22 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Karen Nelson said: Title page verso. But, we are avoiding the Latin = terms in RDA as often as possible. The borrowed terms verso and recto are universal enough IMNSHO to be used in notes, along with i.e. and e.g.. I agree that you should spell out Title page; T.p. is less well known. Even my

Re: [RDA-L] title page verso in 500 note

2013-10-22 Thread Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Karen said, But, we are avoiding the Latin terms in RDA as often as poss., correct? Verso is a perfectly good English word, which you can find in any decent dictionary. Granted, it's a loan word from Latin. But so is title and page (which I assume were brought to the English language via

Re: [RDA-L] 765 note again ((not-quite-so) hypothetical)

2013-10-22 Thread Kevin M Randall
The 765 field is generally used to link *separate resources* that are specific manifestations containing different language expressions of the same work. In the case of a Loeb edition, there isn't really another specific manifestation that this is related to-i.e., considered a translation of