Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call for community discussion

John Myers' suggestion was my first thought as well. We need to think about human differentiation in search results, as well as machine differentiation. In a context where multiple results appear associated with multiple people who happen to have the same name, giving users more clues could

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

I'm posting this to the BIBFRAME list as well since it seemed relevant... To me, the original main entry concept could more usefully be thought about in a larger context of for any field that is repeatable in a set of bibliographic description fields, is it useful to be able to designate one

Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement

-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Akerman, Laura Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:00 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Offlist reactions to the LC Bibliographic Framework statement I'm posting this to the BIBFRAME list as well since it seemed relevant... To me, the original main entry

Re: [RDA-L] [ACAT] Upper case in records

Misha, I assume you've examined the Options in Word and un-checked anything that says replace as you type... ? It's in different places depending on what version, but I found it by opening Spelling and Grammar and clicking Options... Laura From: Resource Description and Access / Resource

Re: [RDA-L] Web catalog

I've been uploading some test records and it got me thinking about catalog displays. ILS OPACs usually displays catalog data in at least 2 different ways: in a results list (either one field in a browse list, or often a few chosen bits in a brief display), and in a record display, which may be