Re: [RDA-L] [ACAT] Main entry in RDA

2012-10-26 Thread Kelleher, Martin
- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas Sent: 25 October 2012 23:27 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] [ACAT] Main entry in RDA Good point, and the LC-PCC PS on 2.4.1.5

Re: [RDA-L] [ACAT] Main entry in RDA

2012-10-25 Thread M. E.
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: In RDA it is required to transcribe and trace only one. To be accurate, RDA requires transcribing the *first* statement of responsibility, not the first name therein. ... / written by X ; illustrated by Y ; edited by Z. Written by X is the bare minimum

Re: [RDA-L] [ACAT] Main entry in RDA

2012-10-25 Thread Brenndorfer, Thomas
and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of M. E. Sent: October 25, 2012 6:08 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] [ACAT] Main entry in RDA J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: In RDA it is required to transcribe and trace only one. To be accurate, RDA

Re: [RDA-L] [ACAT] Main entry in RDA

2012-10-23 Thread James Weinheimer
On 22/10/2012 23:41, J. McRee Elrod wrote: snip I see no advantage in combining 100/240 or 100/245 in nuMARC. They only need to be combined in 600 and 700. In new title lists we print, we give the 100 once, with 245s after in alphabetic order. I see no need to repeat the 100 in print or

Re: [RDA-L] [ACAT] Main entry in RDA

2012-10-22 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Thomas Brenndorfer said: In RDA, if there are four creators listed in the statement of responsibility, the first would go in a 100 and the rest in 700 fields. In AACR2, because of the rule of three, the first listed would go in a 700 field and the rest would be dropped. That's one significant