[RDA-L] 040$erda

2010-09-10 Thread J. McRee Elrod
SLC will retain 040$erda in the master copies of RDA records in its database, as well as all fields (e.g. 336-338), as opposed to deleting any. We normally keep all 6XX fields, for example, but only export those a particular client wants based on 2nd indicator. In an individual library, it seems

Re: [RDA-L] 040$erda

2010-01-28 Thread Myers, John F.
If I recall the discussions, the original thought of coding 'r' for RDA in the LDR/18 exposed the Anglo-centricity of the LDR/18 value 'a' for AACR2, when all of the other national cataloging codes were relegated to 040 $e. Also working from memory, RDA records that are not ISBD punctuated will

[RDA-L] 040$erda

2010-01-27 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Thanks to those of you who reminded me about 040$erda to indicate RDA records. A code in LDR/18 (r?) whould make sorting for export easier for us. I wonder why this departure from past practice? What code will those following RDA without ISBD punctuation use in LDR/18? __ __ J.