SLC will retain 040$erda in the master copies of RDA records in its
database, as well as all fields (e.g. 336-338), as opposed to deleting
any.
We normally keep all 6XX fields, for example, but only export those a
particular client wants based on 2nd indicator. In an individual
library, it seems
If I recall the discussions, the original thought of coding 'r' for RDA
in the LDR/18 exposed the Anglo-centricity of the LDR/18 value 'a' for
AACR2, when all of the other national cataloging codes were relegated to
040 $e. Also working from memory, RDA records that are not ISBD
punctuated will
Thanks to those of you who reminded me about 040$erda to indicate RDA
records. A code in LDR/18 (r?) whould make sorting for export easier
for us. I wonder why this departure from past practice? What code
will those following RDA without ISBD punctuation use in LDR/18?
__ __ J.
3 matches
Mail list logo