Thomas posted:
100 1# $a Cunningham, E. V., $d 1914-2003.
245 10 $a Sylvia / $c by Howard Fast
700 1# $a Fast, Howard, $d 1914-2003
In earlier practice, we would have [pseud.] after Fast in the
statement of responsibility to explain why the SOR differs from the
main entry, and a cross reference
for
the work.
Thomas Brenndorfer
Guelph Public Library
From: J. McRee Elrod [m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: October-18-13 3:03 AM
To: Brenndorfer, Thomas
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Access points vs. cross references
Thomas posted
Hi All,
in such a situation, I'd probably chose
But if the resources were split the following way, with some mentioning only
Fletcher and others only mentioning Bain, then the problem is what to do with
the extra Creator relationship if a 700 field is not used.
Some resources
/ Resource Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Daniel CannCasciato
[daniel.canncasci...@cwu.edu]
Sent: October-18-13 2:45 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Access points vs. cross references - Jessica Fletcher and
Donald Bain
Hi All
Thomas posted:
100 1_ $a Fletcher, Jessica
245 10 $a Trouble at high tide / $c by Jessica Fletcher Donald Bain.
700 1_ $a Bain, Donald, $d 1935-
While RDA does not require it, shouldn't we have $c(Fictitious
character) added to Fletcher? The authority says Use for Fletcher,
Jessica
Carrying that forward with RDA in MARC is a problem because one can't
make Person-to-Work relationships outside of a bibliographic record.
Authority records make Person-to-Person relationships and Work-to-Work
relationships (with some flexibility, such as person-to-corporate body,
for example
That's a source of the misunderstanding right there. RDA doesn't talk about
bibliographic records or authority records, nor does it talk about MARC fields.
It doesn't use the term alternate access point, but it does use variant
access point (defined in the glossary as An alternative to the
-Original Message-
From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: October-17-13 12:36 AM
To: Brenndorfer, Thomas
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Access points vs. cross references
Thomas posted:
Implementing these access points in a card catalog produces
is Cunningham
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
-Original Message-
From: J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:35 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Access points vs. cross references
Thomas posted:
Implementing
Mac Elrod wrote:
Thomas posted:
Implementing these access points in a card catalog produces
Fast, Howard, 1914-2003. Sylvia
see
Cunningham, E.V., 1914-2003. Sylvia
In a card catalogue, Fast is a cross reference, not an alternate
access point.
Even better in a OPAC would be
Thomas said:
All cross-references are access points
That's a silly and confusing ambiguity, but unfortunately not the only
one in RDA. A cross reference leads one *to* an access point (or
entry as we have traditionally called it).
This understanding is just a carryforward from what was
-Original Message-
From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: October-17-13 2:55 PM
To: Brenndorfer, Thomas
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Access points vs. cross references
Thomas said:
All cross-references are access points
That's a silly
Kevin said:
The point that seems to be missed here is that Fast, Howard,
1914-2003 is not a variant access point for the entity identified as
Cunningham, E. V., 1914-2003. It is an authorized access point for
a different entity ... Both forms of name are valid authorized access
points; as such,
Mac Elrod wrote:
The point that seems to be missed here is that Fast, Howard,
1914-2003 is not a variant access point for the entity identified as
Cunningham, E. V., 1914-2003. It is an authorized access point for
a different entity ... Both forms of name are valid authorized access
points;
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
[k...@northwestern.edu]
Sent: October-17-13 6:10 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Access points vs. cross references
Mac Elrod wrote
Thomas posted:
Implementing these access points in a card catalog produces
Fast, Howard, 1914-2003. Sylvia
see
Cunningham, E.V., 1914-2003. Sylvia
In a card catalogue, Fast is a cross reference, not an alternate
access point.
Even better in a OPAC would be being taken directly from the
16 matches
Mail list logo
