Re: [RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place?

2013-10-28 Thread Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Adam said: I think the instruction was written as it is because only one place may be used in a qualifier when needed to break a conflict. Yes, that seems very plausible. One gets the feeling that the person(s) who wrote the instruction were mainly thinking of access points and not of the

Re: [RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place?

2013-10-28 Thread Moore, Richard
October 2013 08:51 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place? Adam said: I think the instruction was written as it is because only one place may be used in a qualifier when needed to break a conflict. Yes, that seems very

Re: [RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place?

2013-10-28 Thread Moore, Richard
-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Heidrun Wiesenmüller Sent: 28 October 2013 08:51 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place? Adam said: I think the instruction was written as it is because only one place may be used in a qualifier

Re: [RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place?

2013-10-28 Thread Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Richard, There are sub-elements for Location of Conference, Etc., and Location of Headquarters, but in 11.3.1.1 these are just examples (note the instruction says .e.g.). I did indeed notice the e.g. and found that odd as well. If location of conference and location of headquarters are just

[RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place?

2013-10-27 Thread Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Can it really be that 11.3.3.3 allows only for the recording of *one* local place associated with a corporate body? The instruction reads: For other bodies, record the name of the local place that is commonly associated with the name of the body (...). Unlike 11.3.2.3 (Recording location of

Re: [RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place?

2013-10-27 Thread Adam Schiff
-Original Message- From: Heidrun Wiesenmüller Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 12:06 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Can corporate bodies only have one associated place? Can it really be that 11.3.3.3 allows only for the recording of *one* local place associated with a corporate