Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a retitled work

2013-10-15 Thread Adam Schiff
-Original Message- From: J. McRee Elrod Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:18 AM To: asch...@u.washington.edu Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a retitled work Adam said: If it is the same work, then you have to decide what the preferred title

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a retitled work

2013-10-14 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Adam said: If it is the same work, then you have to decide what the preferred title of the work is, and if it is not the same as the manifestation you have in hand, then you would add a 240 for the preferred title (or 130 if no creator(s)). No relationship designator is needed. I would

[RDA-L] Relationship designator for a retitled work

2013-10-13 Thread Ann Ryan
What relationship designator are people using for retitled works? This is one of the most common relationships that we deal with: Originally published as: The book in hand: Traveller's French by Elisabeth Smith. London : Hodder Stoughton, 2013. Originally published as: Teach yourself

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a retitled work

2013-10-13 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Ann Ryan asked: What relationship designator are people using for retitled works? We KISS, e.g.: 246 3 $iOriginally published as:$aTeach yourself instant French. There is not need for a second entry under the same author. I do miss 503. Our records are becoming too complex. __

Re: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a retitled work

2013-10-13 Thread Adam L. Schiff
of Washington Libraries On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Ann Ryan wrote: Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:25:55 +1300 From: Ann Ryan a...@wheelers.co.nz To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Relationship designator for a retitled work What relationship designator are people using for retitled works