[RDA-L] Relative severity of rule changes then and now

2011-05-23 Thread J. McRee Elrod
In the discussion of the relative impact of rule changes, the earlier change in form of entry for some corporate bodies was mentioned. The example given was the change from Michigan. University to University of Michigan, resulting, it was said, in a split file. At the University of British

Re: [RDA-L] Relative severity of rule changes then and now

2011-05-23 Thread Ed Jones
/ Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:49 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Relative severity of rule changes then and now In the discussion of the relative impact of rule changes, the earlier

Re: [RDA-L] Relative severity of rule changes then and now

2011-05-23 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Ed Jones said: I am puzzled, however, by your comment below that in OPACs the heading in each record must now be changed. Do you mean changed one-by-one rather than globally? Whether globally or singly, each record must be changed, since the demise of Utlas' linked records. There, changing