Re: [RDA-L] Structure of record (was: Question about RDA relationships)

2010-03-08 Thread Myers, John F.
If I understand things correctly, Dan's example is actually an RDF triple serving the Work 'Moby Dick'. To address the Manifestation issues raised by Mac, one might have: URI(Particular Manifestation of Moby Dick) -- URI(has Statement of Responsibility/is the Statement of Responsibility for) --

Re: [RDA-L] Structure of record (was: Question about RDA relationships)

2010-03-08 Thread Karen Coyle
Quoting Myers, John F. mye...@union.edu: If I understand things correctly, Dan's example is actually an RDF triple serving the Work 'Moby Dick'. To address the Manifestation issues raised by Mac, one might have: URI(Particular Manifestation of Moby Dick) -- URI(has Statement of

Re: [RDA-L] Structure of record

2010-03-08 Thread J. McRee Elrod
John Myers said: URI(Particular Manifestation of Moby Dick) -- URI(has Statement of Responsibility/is the Statement of Responsibility for) -- URI(Herman Melville ; illustrated by Tony Millionaire ; foreword by Nathaniel Philbrick.) Do these URI's refer to data stored inhouse in a linked file, or

Re: [RDA-L] Structure of record

2010-03-08 Thread Myers, John F.
I am but a novice with the semantic web concepts. My sense is that a URI would most effectively work in a web context -- as additional triples are incorporated into the description, then the record is seamlessly updated whenever it is generated. Web-connectivity is a very real issue as Mac

Re: [RDA-L] Structure of record

2010-03-08 Thread Karen Coyle
Quoting J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca: Happy you still favour transcription. But statement of responsibility for both AACR2 and RDA is mapped to MARC 245 /$c; 260 $c is date, apart from CONSER which ignores that part of AACR2. Thanks for catching my 'slip of the fingers.' I did indeed mean