Re: [RDA-L] URL or URI (was RE: Urls in access fields)

2009-07-16 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
It _is_ confusing. My understanding is that these are more or less interchangeable the same. URL was originally called URL. When they generalized the idea of a URL a bit, formalized it a bit, AND realized that (what had been called) URLs were actually really useful as identifiers _as well

Re: [RDA-L] URL or URI (was RE: Urls in access fields)

2009-07-16 Thread Mark Ehlert
Jonathan Rochkind wrote: It _is_ confusing. Indeed. However, I have found this blog post and the comments to be somewhat enlightening for me in the past: http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/11/19/uri-vs-url-whats-the-difference/ -- Mark K. Ehlert Minitex Assistant Librarian 30

Re: [RDA-L] URL or URI (was RE: Urls in access fields)

2009-07-16 Thread John Hostage
You might find this helpful: http://www.loc.gov/standards/uri/ Follow the link for About URIs --- John Hostage Authorities Librarian Langdell Hall host...@law.harvard.edu Harvard

Re: [RDA-L] URL or URI (was RE: Urls in access fields)

2009-07-16 Thread Ben Abrahamse
Hi! I'm pretty new to this list, so forgive me if this post is redundant or insipid, It seems strange to me to use an url to access local information. I think it's better off to just consider URL on obsolete term. Keeping the distinction between the two is still useful, in my mind. The