Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint

2013-11-25 Thread Dana Van Meter
Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:07 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint Dana Van Meter posted: I have a facsimile reprint, which

Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint

2013-11-25 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Dana Van Meter posted: Thanks Mac. Do we really need a 501 note and 700$a$t for the Introduzione, and the bibliography? We would only consider it if written by a very well known person, and it is lengthy. Rather than $t, you could use $ewriter of added text. I kind of found the answer to my

Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint

2013-11-22 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Michael Borries posted: 501 is for use for separate bibliographical works bound together, either by the publisher or the library. We prefer to use exact notes rather than lump everything in 500. This both frees us from determining note order and speeds finding a specific note. We use 501 for

Re: [RDA-L] Facsimile reprint

2013-11-21 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Dana Van Meter posted: I have a facsimile reprint, which is not at first glance a facsimile reprint, but it is. My book has a new title page, followed by 28 unnumbered pages which contain an added Introduction ... I would certainly adjust the collation to include the added pages, record the