We are trying to come to grips with this issue as staff adjust to some of the
peculiarities of
RDA. I would agree that a creator of an illustrated book sans text should be
regarded as the creator
and given the designator artist. Yet, if you read LC-PCC PS for rule 18.5.1.3
it suggests that
I can see how one would arrive at that reading; I just never took it to
mean that LC would never recognize an artist as a creator for children's
materials. The more sensible reading, I think--perhaps a bit of a stretch
given the current wording of the PS--is that IF there are illustrations in
the
Then, in MARC, it can sometimes be using $e illustrator, but at other times $e
artist? Or would one be using both terms? It's somewhat confusing to me.
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
JSC Secretary jscsecret...@rdatoolkit.org 11/23/2012 8:14 AM
Jenny,
The
: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors
Then, in MARC, it can sometimes be using $e illustrator, but at other
times $e artist? Or would one be using both terms? It's somewhat
confusing to me.
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
JSC Secretary
-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors
Then, in MARC, it can sometimes be using $e illustrator, but at other
times $e artist? Or would one be using both terms? It's somewhat
confusing to me.
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
j...@franciscan.edu
: November 26, 2012 11:08 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors
And the searcher, in order to search successfully, would have to know this
distinction in our use of a different qualifier for the same person under
different circumstances
Wu
Sent: November 26, 2012 11:08 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors
And the searcher, in order to search successfully, would have to know this
distinction in our use of a different qualifier for the same person under
different
. Creider
Sent: November 26, 2012 11:27 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors
And all this helps the public how?
--
Laurence S. Creider
Interim Head
Archives and Special Collections Dept.
University Library
New Mexico State
, November 26, 2012 10:35 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors
As an option for navigating the relationships people have had to creative
works, there is the possibility of very user-friendly approaches, as in this
IMDB example
-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 11:33 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors
I think the point
Mike Tribby wrote:
Ox Eckhardt hit .371 in 1932 for the Mission Reds to win the Pacific Coast
League batting title.
But where, if anywhere, do you draw the line? My need to know about
and do research on oldtime minor league baseball doesn't measure up to
the frequent examples of OPAC users
: November 26, 2012 1:21 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Illustrators as creators, not contributors
Mike Tribby wrote:
Ox Eckhardt hit .371 in 1932 for the Mission Reds to win the Pacific
Coast League batting title.
But where, if anywhere, do you draw the line
To make a parallel between Clint Eastwood and Ox Eckhardt, your desire to find
out that Ox Eckhardt hit .371 in 1932 for the Mission Reds to win the Pacific
Coast League batting title would be akin to finding out that Clint Eastwood
took x number of days to direct the film UNFORGIVEN, or worked
13 matches
Mail list logo
