When all elements are lacking, and there's no RDA provision, I suppose
you can for the time being at least, go back to AACR:
Just use: S.L. : s.n., n.d.
Until no mixed record or coding is allowed, or a 264 5 should come
along.
Jack
Jack Wu
Franciscan University of Steubenville
Brenndorfer,
Public Library
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jack Wu
Sent: December-06-13 11:07 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Publication/distribution/manufacturer statement
When all elements
NO, NO, NO!!!
(Yes, the vehemence is intentional and warranted at the gross contravention
of RDA's stipulations in this matter.)
RDA explicitly eliminates the use of AACR2's Latin abbreviations of [S.l. :
s.n.]. The use of [n.d.] from AACR1 was eliminated in AACR2.
There is provision in RDA to
Forgot, that WAS the good old days.
Jack
Myers, John mye...@union.edu 12/6/2013 11:31 AM
NO, NO, NO!!!
(Yes, the vehemence is intentional and warranted at the gross
contravention of RDA's stipulations in this matter.)
RDA explicitly eliminates the use of AACR2's Latin abbreviations of
[S.l.
Jack Wu said:
you can for the time being at least, go back to AACR:
Just use: S.L. : s.n., n.d.
AACR2 did no have n.d.. One was supposed to guess, even [19--?].
RDA provides [Place of publication not identified] etc. Our
cataloguers are instructed to never use those long uninformative
Of course Mac and others are right, there's no n.d. in AACR2, and to guess a
place and a date is better than no information and Not Identified. Still I
wonder, if I know just 1 place and 1 date, as with much legacy data, whether
they are of publication, or distribution, or just copyright will
6 matches
Mail list logo
