J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
*It seems to me such as container should be added here as a source
of title representing the resource as a whole. This is often true of
boxed sets of videorecordings (VHS and DVD), boxed sets of CDs, kits,
games, and boxed pieces to be assembled. all of
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: August 4, 2011 8:14 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] RDA and collective title
RDA 2.1.2.2 --
Is the usefulness of RDA going to require this kind of exegesis? Whew!
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Brenndorfer, Thomas
tbrenndor...@library.guelph.on.ca wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
Thomas said:
Kits come up as an example again in 2.1.2.3, since kits would tend to
be characterized as multipart resources not single unit resources.
You've put your finger on why we had such difficulty doing an
intelligible record for a kit using RDA. A kit is a single item,
often the only
-Original Message-
From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: August 5, 2011 12:55 PM
To: Brenndorfer, Thomas
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA and collective title
Thomas said:
Kits come up as an example again in 2.1.2.3, since kits would tend
5 matches
Mail list logo
