On 4/10/07, Stephen Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the hair that needs splitting here is what is meant by
language. The FRBR report puts the language attribute at the
expression level, defined there as the language in which the work is
expressed. It does not define such a language
Is this list the best place to make (informal) comments and ask
questions, or is there a list specific to the FRAR work?
kc
Patton,Glenn wrote:
The IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of
Authority Records is pleased to announce that a 2nd draft of Functional
At 02:08 PM 4/12/2007, Corey O'Halloran wrote:
3.2.0.2.1. Record the type(s) of media used to convey
the content of the resource using one or more of the
terms listed in Table 1. Record as many terms
as are applicable to the resource being described.
Why use convey here and not reflect?
I think FRAD _is_ FRBR itself. No? If we're talking about models,
FRAD is just adding another important part to the model begun in the
FRBR report. It even changes some things in the FRBR Model as
expressed in the FRBR Report, I believe. (Haven't had time to delve
into it yet, hope to soon).
I would tend to agree. FRAD fills in a lot of the blanks that were
deemed outside the scope of the FRBR document itself. A good example
are access points, which depend on authority data, but are part of a
bibliographic record, and are only mentioned in the Background section
of the FRBR
5 matches
Mail list logo
