On 7/2/07, Layne, Sara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So … with apologies in advance for asking a possibly ignorant question …
can you make the following statement in RDF? That is, can the same sort of
entity be both a subject and an object?
Work2 *is a parody of* Work1
RDF doesn't care what
Martha Yee wrote:
We need a model that recognizes that many works important to our users
are identified by BOTH their authors and their titles. We need a
model that recognizes that the author is more important as an
attribute of a work than as an entity in its own right. Catalogs are
Karen Coyle said:
The entities in a model like FRBR are just the things you are going
to work with. For example, in AACR and MARC we have names; in the
former they are headings (authors, added authors) ...
Such over simplification worries me, perhaps because models we have
seen of possible
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
Access
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle
Sent: July 3, 2007 11:11 AM
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Wrong model--entity relationship?
Martha Yee wrote:
We
From an optimistic and possibly naive perspective, here's how I see
our terms sorting out.
Entities are conceptual things whose primary characteristic is
their uniqueness within a given ontological domain. You can have
multiple names for an entity, but not two entities which are truly
the same
Greetings, Teri.
I serve as a liaison to the ALCTS RDA Implementation Task Force which is
chaired by Dr. Ann O'Neill. I believe she is subscribing to RDA-L, but on the
off-chance she has yet to do so, let me forward your e-mail to her. She can
fill you in on the task force's discussions
6 matches
Mail list logo
