Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote:
Well, let’s wait and see what Chris Oliver has come up with. I
gather the rest of the reworded chapters should appear soon in the Toolkit
(by the way, wasn't it announced that chapters 2 and 3 should be published
in February?).
Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote:
But be that as it may: There is indeed an example for a grammatically
incomplete s-o-r in the ISBD (which was news to me), and this must give us
cause to think again (although of course we know that RDA deviates from the
ISBD
When a resource has parallel statements of responsibility on its chief source
of information, but only the connecting words are parallel, not the names
themselves, how does one treat this under RDA?
E.g., what I see on the t.p.:
Mit Beiträgen von/With contributions by ...
hg. von/ed. by ...
Ben,
I think the / should indeed be replaced by a = according to 1.7.3,
as it obviously is a case of parallel statements of responsibility (i.e.
two different RDA elements). But I'd find it odd to have only Mit
Beiträgen von as one of these statements of responsibility. As this is
only an
Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 2:12 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 2.4.3.3 Parallel statements of responsibility
Ben,
I think the / should indeed be replaced by a = according
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 2:12 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 2.4.3.3 Parallel statements of responsibility
Ben,
I think the / should indeed be replaced by a = according to 1.7.3, as it
obviously
Libraries
617-253-7137
*From:*Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
Access [mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] *On Behalf Of *Heidrun
Wiesenmüller
*Sent:* Monday, April 01, 2013 2:12 PM
*To:* RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] 2.4.3.3 Parallel statements
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 2.4.3.3 Parallel statements of responsibility
I'm afraid so, only I think it should start with mit instead of Mit (mit
being a preposition which is not ordinarily capitalized).
What a lovely example - I'm thrilled ;-)
If you really were
@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Arakawa, Steven
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 3:36 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 2.4.3.3 Parallel statements of responsibility
If you have a single title proper and statements of responsibility in multiple
languages, I think 2.4.2.4
And a related question for those of us in Anglophone countries : would it
be
mit Beiträgen von Fernando Aguiar [and 88 others]
or
mit Beiträgen von Fernando Aguiar [und 88 andere]
?
*Geoffrey Hooker *
http://geoffreyhookermls.blogspot.com/
*It is dangerous to be right when the government is
and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 3:57 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 2.4.3.3 Parallel statements of responsibility
Quite, but that doesn't mean that you cannot record the other statements
Description and Access / Resource Description and
Access [mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] *On Behalf Of *Arakawa,
Steven
*Sent:* Monday, April 01, 2013 3:36 PM
*To:* RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] 2.4.3.3 Parallel statements of responsibility
*If you have a single title proper
I think that the abridgment is a cataloger's decision. So it should be in
the cataloging language, the language of the bibliographic record being
created. Is that right?
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Geoffrey Hooker hook...@gmail.com wrote:
And a
-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Heidrun Wiesenmüller
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 4:12 PM
To: rd...@listserv.lac-BAC.G
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 2.4.3.3 Parallel statements of responsibility
As I just said: It's really not well presented. But now I see that it's even
worse than I thought.
I still believe
Benjamin A Abrahamse babra...@mit.edu wrote:
When a resource has parallel statements of responsibility on its chief
source of information, but only the connecting words are parallel, not
the names themselves, how does one treat this under RDA?
Monkeywrench.
An example from ISBD
Mark,
now that's an interesting point (I had to look up monkeywrench, though).
The particular rule in the ISBD you mentioned seems to refer to a
special situation: When it is not possible to give an appropriate
statement of responsibility after each title or other title information,
the
16 matches
Mail list logo