12.09.2012 18:43, Jonathan Rochkind:
There are a whole bunch of problems with machine actionability in these
data elements -- but seperate element for copyright date isnt'
actually one of them at all!
Right, but it is one very little aspect of the deficient way multipart
entities are still
I have found no guidance on this in RDA (not saying it's not in there, but
searching for copyright or copyright date does not bring it up); so which
is preferable?
264:x4:$c (c)1994-2010
or
264:x4:$c (c)1994-(c)2010
Benjamin Abrahamse
Cataloging Coordinator
Acquisitions, Metadata and
I think since a copyright date must always be preceded by the copyright
symbol, your second option would be more correct. But I'd like to see
what others think about this. If the resource itself says (c)1994-2010
then perhaps it's ok to transcribe it that way. Then again, doesn't RDA
say to
Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:34 AM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Regarding copyright dates for multivolume
Benjamin Abrahamse wrote:
I have found no guidance on this in RDA (not saying it's not in there, but
searching for copyright or copyright date does not bring it up); so
which is preferable?
264:x4:$c (c)1994-2010
or
264:x4:$c (c)1994-(c)2010
As I understand it, the dates on either
12, 2012 11:39
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Regarding copyright dates for multivolume
publications
Thanks for the response.
There is no single copyright statement for the whole work, just an
individual (c) on each vol.
Re: doesn't RDA say to record only
, 2012 11:54 AM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Regarding copyright dates for multivolume publications
There is something redundant about having a separate element for copyright
date, and then including the copyright symbol or other text in the element.
That would seem
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Benjamin A
Abrahamse Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:39 To:
RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Regarding
copyright dates for multivolume publications
Thanks for the response.
There is no single copyright statement for the whole work
] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:34 AM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Regarding copyright dates for multivolume publications
I think since a copyright date must always be preceded by the copyright symbol,
your second option would be more
9 matches
Mail list logo
