Re: Bibliographic identities (was Variant access points?)

2008-02-05 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Karen Coyle said: I think authorized heading for a person is actually an identifier for a creator/persona. If you look at the NAF records for the various personas Mark Twain adopted ... There was a time when there was a cross reference from Twain, Mark to the real person Clemens, Samuel

Re: Bibliographic identities (was Variant access points?)

2008-02-05 Thread Adam L. Schiff
Mark Twain's authority: 100 1_ |a Twain, Mark, |d 1835-1910 500 1_ |w nnnc |a Clemens, Samuel Langhorne, |d 1835-1910 500 1_ |w nnnc |a Snodgrass, Quintus Curtius, |d 1835-1910 500 1_ |w nnnc |a Conte, Louis de, |d 1835-1910 Samuel Clemens' authority: 100 1_ |a Clemens,

Re: Bibliographic identities (was Variant access points?)

2008-02-05 Thread Karen Coyle
Adam, what is it in the record that tells you that Twain is the name of the person? Is there something in the fixed fields? Because in terms of the MARC tags, all of the 5xx's are equal, as far as I can see. So without prior knowledge I wouldn't know which of the 1xx forms represents the actual

Re: Bibliographic identities (was Variant access points?)

2008-02-05 Thread John Hostage
For cataloging purposes, there is no category for "the actual person." We have established headings for different bibliographic identities, one of which is chosen as the "basic heading" according to various criteria. (This procedure is used only when more than two names are involved.) It

Re: Bibliographic identities (was Variant access points?)

2008-02-05 Thread Adam L. Schiff
All of the names are valid for use in name-title headings, not just the base heading. The base heading is simply the authority record that contains the complete list of all other see also references. LC instituted this to save the time of catalogers having to make the full complement of see

Re: Bibliographic identities (was Variant access points?)

2008-02-05 Thread Karen Coyle
Adam, thank you so much for hanging in there and answering my questions -- this really helps me understand the meaning of the fields in the bibliographic record. In case you (and others) are wondering, I'm pretty agnostic on what the fields SHOULD represent -- I just want to know what they DO