That sounds good to me. Obviously the stuff we've been talking about
is destabilizing enough so that working in a new dev branch would be
good.
Joe
On 7/12/07, Andrew Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
> Andrew has blessed us with a plethora of commits. it seems appropriat
On 7/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Joe Beda wrote:
> (Having code to move the mirror forward and backward in time might be
> interesting too at some point -- that way you could undo bad backups
> by moving the mirror back in time and r
I'm still forming a plan (and busy at work so real hacking will have
to wait for the weekend) but my thinking was to write forward diffs
into the increment directory directly. I would change the way that
current_mirror gets written and the diffing would have to take into
account the mirror+forwa
t
snapshot -- even if there is a long backup going on. However, it is a
more fundamental change. Any thoughts or advice before I start
writing code?
Joe
On 7/9/07, Dave Kempe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Beda wrote:
> To make rdiff-backup work for me, I'd have to add the following
&
project and is very interesting.
So -- questions to the group: Are these features welcome? Is anyone
already working on these? Is there a development mailing list?
Thanks!
Joe Beda
___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@non
