Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Restarting development ... or starting over

2010-04-07 Thread covici
Randy Syring rsyr...@inteli-com.com wrote: Daniel Miller wrote: I wasn't really prepared to make this announcement so soon, but now seems like a good time to let the community know. I've been working on a new implementation of rdiff-backup since about a month ago when I dug into the

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Restarting development ... or starting over

2010-04-06 Thread Daniel Miller
I wasn't really prepared to make this announcement so soon, but now seems like a good time to let the community know. I've been working on a new implementation of rdiff-backup since about a month ago when [snip] I'm not a coder... [snip] Now, on top of that I'd like to have all the

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Restarting development ... or starting over

2010-04-06 Thread Nicolas Jungers
On 04/06/2010 02:34 PM, Daniel Miller wrote: I wasn't really prepared to make this announcement so soon, but now seems like a good time to let the community know. I've been working on a new implementation of rdiff-backup since about a month ago when [snip] I'm not a coder... [snip] Now, on

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Restarting development ... or starting over

2010-04-06 Thread Randy Syring
Daniel Miller wrote: I wasn't really prepared to make this announcement so soon, but now seems like a good time to let the community know. I've been working on a new implementation of rdiff-backup since about a month ago when I dug into the current codebase and discovered its disappointing

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Restarting development ... or starting over

2010-04-05 Thread Daniel Miller
I wasn't really prepared to make this announcement so soon, but now seems like a good time to let the community know. I've been working on a new implementation of rdiff-backup since about a month ago when I dug into the current codebase and discovered its disappointing quality. While what I

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Restarting development ... or starting over

2010-04-05 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:25:27PM -0400, Daniel Miller wrote: - Did I mention that the new version has been developed from the ground up with full unicode support? Please note that this new version will obviously not be backward compatible with older rdiff-backup repositories. While a tool

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Restarting development ... or starting over

2010-04-05 Thread Willard Korfhage
Two questions: 1) are you planning to better handle renamed files? That's killin' me. I have thought about this, and I don't think it would be too hard to implement this using inode tracking. However, it might incur more memory overhead. Input is welcome. I'm a former rdiff-backup

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Restarting development ... or starting over

2010-04-05 Thread Nicolas Jungers
On 04/05/2010 08:25 PM, Daniel Miller wrote: I wasn't really prepared to make this announcement so soon, but now seems like a good time to let the community know. I've been working on a new implementation of rdiff-backup since about a month ago when [snip] I'm not a coder, an mainly a lurker