... sounds like a good explanation. If this is indeed the case, it would be
reasonable to force flush to get guaranteed non-random behavior.
Thanks!
Best,
Dmitri
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 7:39 AM, Brian Kelley wrote:
>
> After some digging, it looks like the underlying C++
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Peter S. Shenkin wrote:
> But we have learned that RDKit can do the imparsable
>
>
Oh... Peter...
you should be ashamed. :-)
--
Attend Shape: An AT Tech Expo July
But we have learned that RDKit can do the imparsable
-P.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Marta Stępniewska-Dziubińska <
mart...@ibb.waw.pl> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> To be honest, I expected it to fail :)
>
> I want to find structures with a defined topology, but allow for
> different bond
After some digging, it looks like the underlying C++ streams aren't
flushing. This means that python might not actually have all the
information when you print them out. We may have to enable a "flush"
function for these streams for better error reporting on the python side,
I'll need to
Hi Greg,
To be honest, I expected it to fail :)
I want to find structures with a defined topology, but allow for
different bond types. My first idea was to use SMARTS with ~ bonds,
and it works fine with GetSubstructMatch.
I don't really need MCS, I just used it to check different patterns.
But
Hi Maria,
Output 11 is certainly wrong (the SMARTS generated is incorrect).
I suspect this is happening because the molecule "coa" (input 3 in your
notebook) is constructed from SMARTS and includes ~ bonds (which match any
bond type). I almost think that the MCS code should be generated to fail
Hi all,
I got a very surprising error: RDKit generated a SMARTS string that it
cannot parse. Here's my code: https://goo.gl/ETvjjT
In order to explain the code: I create a structural pattern with SMARTS.
It's a strange pattern, I admit, but I was able to find it in my
molecule. I then try to
7 matches
Mail list logo