Re: [Rdkit-discuss] The fragmentMatcher (SubstructMatcher) is not as good as expected

2016-10-27 Thread 杨弘宾
Thanks, it works!    I appreciate that Rdkit is so strict in representation of the the molecules and the substructures. I learned a lot in the mail list. Hongbin Yang   From: Paolo ToscoDate: 2016-10-27 17:19To: 杨弘宾; rdkit-discussSubject: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] The fragmentMatcher

Re: [Rdkit-discuss] The fragmentMatcher (SubstructMatcher) is not as good as expected

2016-10-27 Thread Paolo Tosco
Dear Hongbin, I am afraid The SMARTS you are using is not valid, as no SSSR can have less than 3 terms, or it wouldn't be a ring. If you change[a!r0] into, for instance, [a!r3], then you'll find the match you are looking for. Cheers, p. On 27/10/2016 09:36, 杨弘宾 wrote: Hi, I tryied

[Rdkit-discuss] The fragmentMatcher (SubstructMatcher) is not as good as expected

2016-10-27 Thread 杨弘宾
Hi,? ? I tryied using rdkit to match fragments with compounds only to find that rdkit performed not well in SMARTS. The following is the notebook I worked. from rdkit import Chem from rdkit.Chem import AllChem from rdkit.Chem import FragmentMatcher from rdkit.Chem.Draw import IPythonConsole