ss@lists.sourceforge.net>
Betreff: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] atom mapping in reaction searches
Hi Sebastian,
The reason this had me confused is that information about atom mapping is not taken into account when doing substructure search matching. This is true both of molecules and reactions.
I
Hi Sebastian,
The reason this had me confused is that information about atom mapping is
not taken into account when doing substructure search matching. This is
true both of molecules and reactions.
I also tried to reproduce your examples in Python and failed completely.
Your question about
n if the answer is that this
> feature is currently not included in RDKit, it would still be helpful :-)
>
> Best regards
> Sebastian
>
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 24. April 2018 um 09:33 Uhr
> *Von:* "Sebastian Wandernoth" <s_wandern...@gmx.de>
> *An:* rdkit-discuss@
On 10/05/2018 10:39, carlo del moro wrote:
I put an example for better explain my problem.
starting from a PDB representing HPE, I use RDKIT/obabel for calculate the
relative SMILES.
The three-letter-code (chemical component id) in a PDB file has meaning - it is a pointer to chemistry. The
Hi,
The smiles atom order is saved in a private property
'_smilesAtomOutputOrder', see discussion on Github:
https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/issues/794
The order of atoms in PDB is the same as in RDKit's Mol object, thus it's
fairly easy to find such mapping.
Pozdrawiam, | Best regards,
Thanks to all for the replies,
I put an example for better explain my problem.
starting from a PDB representing HPE, I use RDKIT/obabel for calculate the
relative SMILES. Next, using a RDKIT's function I fragment the smiles in
substructure like this "CC(=O)O"; now I need to remap this
ern...@gmx.de>
An: rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: [Rdkit-discuss] atom mapping in reaction searches
Hey guys,
I'm still working on my search engine for reactions and I'm a bit puzzled as to what RDKit does with atom mapping information.
I'm still working with the PostgreSQL cartridg
On 05/09/2018 10:27 AM, carlo del moro wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> we would like to know if it is possible to map the atom's ID of a SMILES
> represented substructure to the atom sequence of a ligand contained in a
> pdb file. This in order to get the spatial coordinates related to such
>
On 09/05/2018 16:27, carlo del moro wrote:
we would like to know if it is possible to map the atom's ID of a SMILES represented substructure to the
atom sequence of a ligand contained in a pdb file. This in order to get the spatial coordinates related to
such substructure.
Depending on
Dear All,
we would like to know if it is possible to map the atom's ID of a SMILES
represented substructure to the atom sequence of a ligand contained in a
pdb file. This in order to get the spatial coordinates related to such
substructure.
Best regards
Carlo
Hey guys,
I'm still working on my search engine for reactions and I'm a bit puzzled as to what RDKit does with atom mapping information.
I'm still working with the PostgreSQL cartridge version 0.73.0, which should correspond to the release 2017.9.3.
I'm starting off with this example
Dear Jan,
this gist shows a way to do what you need:
https://gist.github.com/ptosco/9b4a637a2814426846fe181f15aa8cdc
Basically, you'll need to convert explicit Hs into real atoms. Please
note that indices in the tuple obtained in the match with hydrogens
still apply to the original molecules
I am trying to map atoms in one molecule to those of another using
GetSubstructMatch, but have a problem with molecule pairs like the two below
The problem is that GetSubstructMatch ignored the H on the n, so that the
protonated “n" in mol1 is mapped to the deprotonated “n”
in mol2, and vice
Hi Jan,
I'm not aware of an implementation of atom mapping for reactions based on
the RDKit.
-greg
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Jan Halborg Jensen
wrote:
> I just came across this paper http://pubs.acs.org/doi/
> abs/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00764 which presents an variant
I just came across this paper
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00764 which presents an variant
of the Fewest Bonds First with Constructive Count Vector method by Crabtree and
Mehta (https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1498697)
Has anyone implemented anything similar in with RDKit?
15 matches
Mail list logo