The molecule has been constructed without problems, but the jupyter
rendering code is failing.
This isn't particularly surprising, that code is really set up to render
non-query molecules, not things constructed from SMARTS.
If you want to get a rendering of a molecule build from SMARTS in the
Hi, Greg.
Thanks a lot for your code.
I met another error. I don't know whether it's Normal.
I have a correct SMILES, and read it through MolFromSmarts:
sa = 'CC(C)(C)c1ccc(cc1)C(O)CCCN1CCC(CC1)C(O)(c1c1)c1c1'
Here's a simple bit of code that shows how to get only pharmacophore
features whose atoms are contained completely in the MCS:
https://gist.github.com/greglandrum/faf47bd161d9b3af5374c358d0a0786d
An interesting extension to this, which I may do for a blog post later, is
to further filter things
Interesting use case.
I can send some sample code for this later this afternoon.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Chicago Ji wrote:
> Hi, Greg,
>
> The SMARTS comes from MCS.FindMCS() analysis. It seems that MCS can only
> output the result as SMARTS.
>
> Maybe I can
Hi, Greg,
The SMARTS comes from MCS.FindMCS() analysis. It seems that MCS can only
output the result as SMARTS.
Maybe I can calculate atom features of the "mother molecule', and then
extract those belonging to the common substructure.
Or I can delete some atoms of the 'mother molecule', and
Using the pharmacophore search code on molecules constructed from SMARTS
is, in many circumstances, unlikely to yield the results that you are
looking for. Query-Query matching is different than Query-Atom matching.
It's more common to look for ph4 features in molecules constructed from
SMILES or
Hi Greg,
I want to get pharmacophore feature for each atom on the molecule using
GetFeaturesForMol().
It seems that sanitization is a must before running GetFeaturesForMol().
Many Thanks.
Best,
Changge
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Greg Landrum
wrote:
> Hi
Hi Changge,
Is there any particular reason that you're calling updatePropertyCache on
the molecule? That's not an operation that's normally necessary.
Best,
-greg
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Chicago Ji wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I met a problem with Aromatic N atoms.
8 matches
Mail list logo