RE: [Reactor for CF] regenerating dictionary xml files

This is a bug. I think it might even be in trac. It needs to be fixed. These should update automagically. Somehow or other! Maybe in 2.0 Ill make these CFCs with static strings in them! (duh! Slaps self) That way to change a message you just override the property or something. Doug

Re: [Reactor for CF] regenerating dictionary xml files

thanks for a quick answer.With a little investigation, it appears that messages for new fields are added but old ones aren't removed. I guess it's hard to figure which are custom and which were automatically generated. On 7/24/06, Doug Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a bug.

RE: [Reactor for CF] regenerating dictionary xml files

Yet another example of why the dictionaries shouldnt be XML. Doug From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Beth Bowden Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 1:44 PM To: reactor@doughughes.net Subject: Re: [Reactor for CF] regenerating dictionary xml files

Re: [Reactor for CF] regenerating dictionary xml files

You live, you learn, you refactor.TeddyOn 7/24/06, Doug Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yet another example of why the dictionaries shouldn't be XML. Doug From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Beth Bowden Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 1:44 PM

Re: [Reactor for CF] Ambiguous Record? how come?

Are you sure you cleared the cache? I had the same problem, my table had a primary key set but it turns out i was in production mode and did not clear the cache. Im sure you have already done this but its just an idea. On 7/24/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting this exact same

RE: [Reactor for CF] Ambiguous Record? how come?

Make sure to update from SVN and delete project folder. There was a bug fix with DAO creation that could be contributing to this problem. - Shannon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond Camden Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 9:58 PM To: