27709
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 1:55 AM
To: reactor@doughughes.net
Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF] Oracle support for Reactor
On 2/20/06, Doug Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, when working with oracle you need
. BOX 12233, Research Triangle Park,
NC 27709
From: Brian Kotek
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
8:18 AM
To: reactor@doughughes.net
Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF]
Oracle support for Reactor
Perhaps something
user-configurable in the config set specifically
CTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
8:18 AM
To: reactor@doughughes.net
Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF]
Oracle support for Reactor
Perhaps something
user-configurable in the config set specifically for Oracle (or any
other DBs that don't have autonumber)? Maybe something like this (with
autonumber
to an object and configure Reactor
to automagically call it, that would be great.
Chris
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Kotek
Sent: 21 February 2006 13:47
To: reactor@doughughes.net
Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF] Oracle support
On 2/21/06, Bowden, Beth (NIH/NIEHS) [E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about just two pktypes, autonumber or function? Function would
mean use the getUniqueID function. This would add additional flexibility
to use any different numbering scheme.
That sounds like a good solution to me but two
Doug,
I've run into one problem migrating the Reactor blog to Oracle. Oracle doesn't
have an autonumber or identity equivalent. So the function,
Convention.lastInseredIdSyntax, doesn't work. Oracle has sequences which can
be used as a work-around. The code below is a modified version of the
@doughughes.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Reactor For CF] Oracle support for Reactor
Doug,
I've run into one problem migrating the Reactor blog to Oracle. Oracle
doesn't have an autonumber or identity equivalent. So the function,
Convention.lastInseredIdSyntax, doesn't work. Oracle has sequences which
7 matches
Mail list logo