You have to draw the distinguish between the object o1 and the word
'o1 which is a label identifying the object.
You just need to reduce the series to translate the words into the
objects they reference.
You can think of square brackets ([])as being rather like quotation marks ().
Within
Gregg.
Do you have cygwin installed?
Ged.
On Nov 29, 2007 9:09 PM, Gregg Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JFA And now there is the E text editor for Windows that uses Textmate
JFA bundles: http://e-texteditor.com/
This could be great, but it doesn't seem to like my REBOL bundle,
brought
On Nov 15, 2007 7:43 PM, Gregg Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how, or if, people want to collaborate on it, but I'm
happy to host it on my site, so it's readily available. I'm just short
of time at the moment to do much with it.
Gregg,
Thanks. I'd be grateful if you could
On 6/8/07, Robert M. M=FCnch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, IIRC there is a way (word) to avoid code like this:
either my-word [my-word][none]
But I can't remember it... anyone? Robert
attempt [my-word]
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with
Hi,
I'm just getting to grips with contexts and the like, and I have a
quick question.
Given a context, like t: context [a:1 b:2 c:3], is it possible to
remove one of the members. For example removing b so that t is [a:1
c: 3]?
Thanks,
Ged.
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an
Thanks Anton.
On 5/30/07, Anton Rolls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer is no.
You can't add or remove members from an object.
Once created, the members are fixed.
The only thing you can do is derive a new object
from the old one, specifying only the members you want to keep,
and then
On 5/18/07, Gregg Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both AWK and GREP take the program/pattern first. I did that for both
of mine originally, then changed RAWK to take the sources first, which
I think I prefer. They could both eventually load their program or
pattern specs from disk, and files
Thanks Gabriele,
I don't think I'll bother anybody directly, since I am only curious.
Thanks for replying.
Ged.
On 5/14/07, Gabriele Santilli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/5/10, Ged Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see that QTask is given another name check. I'd love to see how it
compares
On 5/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm a newbie to REBOL and TDD/run.r
I like the the concept of TDD. I have read through the case study by the
author of run.r ( a great program)
I can see how the test framework operates on the maths functions presented.
But
I would say that levels 3 and 4 may be the wrong way round.
Writing REBOL actually comes before reading REBOL.
I was able to get REBOL to do what I wanted long before I was able to
work out the code of others.
Ged.
On 4/30/07, Anton Rolls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brian,
two errors of
I would have thought that within a dialect words should behave consistanly.
Do you have any examples of a word serving multiple purposes within a
single dialect?
Ged.
On 4/19/07, Ladislav Mecir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ged Byrne napsal(a):
Ladislav,
Isn't the terminology
see Rebol as
Forthlike?
Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen
On 3/22/07, Tim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2007 13:23, Ged Byrne wrote:
Are many REBOLers former FORTHers? Does anybody else think that Ian
Brodies Thinking FORTH should be required reading (or better
I've been on and off with REBOL for years now. I'd try it for one
purpose, and get blown away be the expressive power. Then I'd try it
for something else and wind up hopelessly muddled. I'd reached the
conclusion that I just wasn't smart enough.
However, all this changed after spending a
Yes, but the future isn't very bright. By 2024 there are only going
to be 7 messages in June!
On 3/22/07, Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
just a little note that rebol's stats clearly show the ML use has been
reaching previous year levels.:-)
14 matches
Mail list logo
