On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Arie van Wingerden wrote:
Hi guys,
since some time I have got my REBOL promotion website
http://home.zonnet.nl/rebolution running.
In order to serve the REBOL community best, I ask you to check my site for
correctness and completeness. If you think it's worthwile,
I've never been content with the documentation I've found relating to
the usage of tcp based ports. The official REBOL documentation lightly
touches on them but it's never been detailed enough, at least in my
opinion. So here I am, with a few questions for the list :]
The ultimate end goal
Hi Carl,
On Sunday, November 9, 2003, 5:37:38 AM, you wrote:
CR Anyway, I've found I get an empty block returned if I use a port
CR instead of an URL, so that provides a way around it. Would've been
CR easier using an URL though...
When using the URL, did you try both with and without the
Hi Phil,
On Sunday, November 9, 2003, 7:43:31 AM, you wrote:
set/any 'error try [print ]
disarm error
puc ** Script Error: error has no value
puc ** Near: disarm error
if error? set/any 'error try [print ] [
print mold disarm error
]
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele
Here is a (non-tested) sample:
Portz: copy []
Server-port: open/no-wait tcp://:9090
Insert portz server-port
Forever
[
;Use wait/all as all our ports are in one block
current: wait/all portz
;If it's the server accept and add to the list
either server-port = current
[
append
Phil pointed out:
Yes ... but that isnt using the suggested method of set/any 'error try
[..]
Curse that unset value!
(What? It worked last time.) :)
If I had my way, 'print would return what it printed.
Andrew J Martin
Speaking in tongues and performing miracles.
ICQ: 26227169
A telnet-chat-server is here:
http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=telnetchat.r
could be extensible as a mud.
-Volker
Am Sonntag, 9. November 2003 08:38 schrieb Seth:
I've never been content with the documentation I've found relating to
the usage of tcp based
On 09-Nov-03, Gabriele Santilli wrote:
Hi Carl,
On Sunday, November 9, 2003, 5:37:38 AM, you wrote:
Anyway, I've found I get an empty block returned if I use a port
instead of an URL, so that provides a way around it. Would've
easier using an URL though...
When using the URL, did you
Same idea. If you have an error
you must disarm it before looking at it.
Let's go back to the tried and true method
which I use all the time:
either error? set/any 'err try [...][
; An error happened
err: disarm err
probe err
][
Carl Read wrote:
Brett Handley wrote:
That's odd. I get an empty block returned when I create an empty
directory on my website and then read it.
Maybe you should trace the connection and see what conversation the
server is having with REBOL.
Except I don't know how to do that. :)
Hello all,
thanks very much for the comments on the site.
I'll think about setting up a kind of journal Gregg. Don't know yet whether it will be
useful for a lot of people ...
The colour scheme is a question of taste Anton. So, indeed use your own scheme :-)
Phil, with the small footprint I
* Arie van Wingerden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031109 05:14]:
Hello all,
thanks very much for the comments on the site.
I'll think about setting up a kind of journal Gregg. Don't know yet whether it will
be useful for a lot of people ...
I recommend that you do that.
The colour scheme is
Tim wrote (in another thread):
...comprehending rebol's multi-level evaluation process which is very
different from other (non-lisp) languages.
Is there a need for more information here?
Andrew J Martin
Attendance Officer
Speaking in tongues and performing miracles.
Colenso High School
Arnold
Hi, Anton.
You wrote:
My system also doesn't have a concept of dependencies that the Needs
block addresses (yet). It's up to the programmer to write in the header
somewhere which words are needed and up to the user to check. I've been
planning to add that at some stage but haven't figured out
Volker wrote (in another thread):
Hmm, eventually rebol.org could mark RT-style-scripts so people can
look up official examples when in doubt?
Perhaps this could be a declaration in the header? For example:
Style: 'Rebol-Official
People who prefer different styles could then
* Andrew Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031109 17:09]:
Volker wrote (in another thread):
Hmm, eventually rebol.org could mark RT-style-scripts so people can
look up official examples when in doubt?
Perhaps this could be a declaration in the header? For example:
Style:
* Andrew Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031109 16:57]:
Tim wrote (in another thread):
...comprehending rebol's multi-level evaluation process which is very
different from other (non-lisp) languages.
Is there a need for more information here?
When I get passt my current 'time-crunch', I
What would Rebol, version 3 look like?
Here's some of my thoughts:
* Lots more datatypes! For example, a Telephone! data type, temperature,
audio/sound data-type, metric and imperial units like 123.5Km, 50MpH,
and so on. I'd like a Rebol script that can ring a cell phone and
deliver a spoken
if Temperature 1.0°C [
telephone +25-123-4567 rejoin [
%FrostWarning.wav %At.wav %Location.wav
]
]
if Temperature 1.0°C [
telephone +25-123-4567 [
On 10-Nov-03, G. Scott Jones wrote:
Carl Read wrote:
Brett Handley wrote:
That's odd. I get an empty block returned when I create an empty
directory on my website and then read it.
Maybe you should trace the connection and see what conversation
the server is having with REBOL.
Hi Carl,
Try one more quick test:
apply http://www.codeconscious.com/rebsite/rebol-library/patches.r
or just run the FTP part of it and see if that changes anything.
BTW, what version of REBOL are you having the problem with?
Regards,
Brett.
Carl wrote:
And here's the output when reading
21 matches
Mail list logo
