Thanks Scott;
That is exactly what I was trying to do. By telling me what I needed to
look under provided solutions to several other problems I was trying to
find answers to.
I really appreciate the help.
Paul
--
Linux User Number: 348867
Hi, Paul,
What you seek can be found under the
I've been playing with the console some more and discovered something that
is strange to me. When I type:
clear: print [^L]
and then type:
print clear
I get:
?unset?
At the top of the page. I assume that Rebol wants me to set clear; so I try:
set 'clear print [^L]
but when I do:
print
Please disregard this question. I stumbled on to the answer. Just incase
some other newbie comes across this:
The solution is to use:
do clear
instead of:
print clear
Paul
--
Linux User Number: 348867
I've been playing with the console some more and discovered something that
is
Hi Paul,
I think is has to do with the fact that CLEAR is a REBOL word. Have a look
at:
http://www.rebol.com/docs/words/wclear.html
Hope that helps,
Arie
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 1:07 PM
Subject: [REBOL]
Hello Paul,
To avoid using the word do like in do clear you need to define clear as
a function like :
REBOL []
cls: func
[ {Efface la console. CLS pour CLear Screen.}]
[ prin ^L]
or just
clear: does [prin ^L]
After that i think only clear is working like you finaly want.
yos
Ah! thanks Arie. I tried to clear the console with clear and when it
didn't do what I wanted I started looking at other ways to do it. I did
think of it being a reserved word for some purpose other than clearing the
console.
I appreciate the input.
Paul
--
Linux User Number: 348867
Hi
Back in February, we unveiled some basic support for *packages* in the Script
Library (i.e. multi-file applications)
http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-display-message.r?m=rmlMTXQ
And we ran a competition, and got lots of useful feedback. Thanks again,
everyone.
Another
Yes! that is exactly what I am wanting. Since, as Arie was kind enough to
point out, clear is a reserved word in Rebol I changed it to cls so
that it is now cls: does [prin ^L].
Thanks for the help;
Paul
--
Linux User Number: 348867
Hello Paul,
To avoid using the word do like in do
No, it should still work. Look:
clear: does [print hello]
clear
hello
Rebol allows you to freely change the value of
most words. I would advise against doing that
with clear, though; it's an often used function.
Also check out:
TUI Dialect - A dialect to print ASCII
Hi Paul,
Two more hints for you.
pbc ...Since, as Arie was kind enough to point out, clear is a
pbc reserved word in Rebol I changed it to cls so that it is now
pbc cls: does [prin ^L].
The important one is HELP; i.e. the HELP function in REBOL. If you
aren't sure whether a word has been
hi ppl,
just thought I'd give you a little primer on how to use repack.
-start by runnning it (from the web or downloaded).
-you will see the ui is separated in 5:
* a header
* a package browser pane
* the package specification/download setup pane
* the message box (which prints
No the message was never received.
And no the SMTP server is not an Exchange box. If this doesn't work with non-Exchange
SMTP servers, do you know of anything that does?
Stuart
Original Message
From: Anton Rolls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu,
Thanks Scott.
Sorry I didn't understand that the scripts were for SMTP on MS Exchange only. I know
my ISP is not using Exchange servers, so do you think the scripts should still work,
or is there another way to pass username/password to non Exchange SMTP servers?
Thanks for the help.
Stuart
I am pretty new to REBOL and am having a bit of trouble getting my head around how to
parse out strings from lines I am reading in from session logs.
I am looking at clear find and remove/part and things like this but I am getting
very confused as to what to use when, I am more of a left$,
From: ML
...
Sorry I didn't understand that the scripts were for SMTP
on MS Exchange only. I know my ISP is not using Exchange
servers, so do you think the scripts should still work,
or is there another way to pass username/password to non
Exchange SMTP servers?
...
Hi, Stuart,
It
From: ML
...
Suppose the line I am parsing says:
the user jsmith logged in at 4.30pm
Can you give me a clue what I would use to
parse in each of these circumstances where
the desired text is:
1. the user
2. the user jsmith
3. jsmith
4. jsmith logged in at 4.30pm
5. logged in at
by using left right mid mentality...
use COPY and AT
so here we go:
with
str: the user jsmith logged in at 4.30pm
1. the user
copy/part str 8
2. the user jsmith
copy/part str 15
3. jsmith
copy/part at str 10 6
4. jsmith logged in at 4.30pm
copy at str 10
5. logged in at
17 matches
Mail list logo
