[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-03-02 Thread Hallvard Ystad
Hello I don't know if I'm supposed to report bugs for view1.3, and I don't know where to, and this list surely is not the best place, but here goes anyway: I have a problem updating lists with the newest view1.3beta. When I update, the contents are almost there, because the slider clearly

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-03-02 Thread Ammon Johnson
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 1:50 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3] Hello I don't know if I'm supposed to report bugs for view1.3, and I don't know where to, and this list surely is not the best place, but here goes anyway: I have a problem updating lists

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-03-02 Thread Hallvard Ystad
function and you are good to go! HTH ~~Ammon ;~ - Original Message - From: Hallvard Ystad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 1:50 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3] Hello I don't know if I'm supposed to report bugs for view1.3

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-03-02 Thread Ammon Johnson
Message - From: Hallvard Ystad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:17 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3] Ah! Brilliant. So now 'prob works again. updating BOTH 'lines and 'data in the list doesn't seem to bother neither earlier versions

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-02-20 Thread Henrik Mikael Kristensen
Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch wrote: who is doing the docs, has anyone really taken charge or is everyone expecting Carl S. to do it? (just asking, no sarcasm intended!) Carl made the original proposal and I think he wrote all the docs too. I can't find anything in the bug tracker about other

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-02-19 Thread Ammon Johnson
The time planned for release was January 1. I haven't heard a date mentioned since we passed that date. I think we have a particular scope for what needs to be fixed/enhanced and as soon as we reach that point then it will be released... HTH ~~Ammon ;~ - Original Message - From:

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-02-19 Thread Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch
is there anyone working on docs as the features are added/refined? -MAx --- You can either be part of the problem or part of the solution, but in the end, being part of the problem is much more fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-02-19 Thread Arie van Wingerden
Hi Sunanda and others, thanks for the replies. Seems we'll have to wait some extra time for the GA version then. For now I'm glad with the links to the latest betas! Thanks, Arie - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-02-19 Thread Henrik Mikael Kristensen
Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch wrote: is there anyone working on docs as the features are added/refined? There is a new document on the image! datatype, because it has changed completely in behavior. http://www.rebol.net/projects/view1.3/image.html Also a new View manual has been proposed in the same

[REBOL] Re: [Time frame for REBOL/VIEW 1.3]

2004-02-19 Thread Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch
There is a new document on the image! datatype, because it has changed completely in behavior. http://www.rebol.net/projects/view1.3/image.html this has made my day :-) Also a new View manual has been proposed in the same format as the current HTML based Core manual. TOC