if not of
general concern.
I'll try to use as much transparency as possible.
- Original Message -
From: Cybarite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:13 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: understanding rebol
I have started to revive my 2001 version of easy-vid.r
I have started to revive my 2001 version of easy-vid.r.
---Script and Outline
I will have a version by Friday in two formats:
a. vid-usage.r that can be posted to the script library
b. the vid-usage.leo which is the LEO outline for the same
---Why Leo
I like LEO for organizing scripts
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:13 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: understanding rebol
I have started to revive my 2001 version of easy-vid.r.
---Script and Outline
I will have a version by Friday in two formats:
a. vid-usage.r that can be posted to the script library
b. the vid
On 05-Jan-04, Anthony Morford wrote:
i am just beginning working with rebol. and i know
very little of programming. im sure that taking a
rebol workshop would make understanding it alot easier
but i decide to go the cheaper, more personal, route -
reading the manual. ive read it once
THANKS GUYS:) !
--- Carl Read [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05-Jan-04, Anthony Morford wrote:
i am just beginning working with rebol. and i know
very little of programming. im sure that taking a
rebol workshop would make understanding it alot
easier
but i decide to go the cheaper,
Here are the bullets from Carl's designer tip sheet that may be useful:
1. forget the past
2. think simple
3. scripts start with a header
4. data drives it
5. names are critical
6. use words not strings
7. code in style
8. examples save time
9. learn series
10. embed your documentation
11.
Hi Anthony,
You've gotten some great advice, so I'll just add a couple comments.
Don't confuse the difficulty of learning to program with learning
REBOL; you're learning two things at once. Don't despair if it seems
like things aren't going as fast as you would like at first. You'll
get there.
for text list, windows, scroll, etc...
Doesn't seem too long to adapat for the runnable DEMO.
Who wants to try his hands at it. It will be a sure winner!
Gerard
- Original Message -
From: Cybarite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 6:40 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re
---
You can either be part of the problem or part of the solution, but in the end, being
part of the problem is much more fun.
-Original Message-
From: Cybarite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 6:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: understanding rebol
Hi Max,
Yes I would like to see this and the ref doc tool rescuscitated.
the ref-doc.r is my single most usefull rebol self-help tool. It is out of date,
but man its usefull. it would be fun to merge
both ideas by creating a base viewer and using m-d-p files as catalogues which can be
Hi Cybarite,
C Is there any interest in resurrecting this stuff?
EasyVID is awesome. I keep a link handy to a few things and it's one
of them. I think it would be great to see it updated.
-- Gregg
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL
Welcome Anthony!
my advice:
Start *very simple* using Rebol/Core ..and play interactively as much as
possible.
Rebol is very simple but also can be very sophisticated.
It is essential you learn to handle the basics of creating and navigating
Rebol blocks and series.
They are quite unique in
Jason Cunliffe wrote:
Welcome Anthony!
my advice:
Start *very simple* using Rebol/Core ..and play interactively as much as
possible.
Yes, the console is very important in the step towards learning new
things and how commands behave. I build programs in small chunks at a
time on the
Message-
From: Anton Rolls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Understanding +
This has been fixed in REBOL/View 1.2.10.3.1
+ 1 2
== 3
type? (+ 1 2)
== integer!
Anton.
Hello list,
there is a difference
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Understanding +
This has been fixed in REBOL/View 1.2.10.3.1
+ 1 2
== 3
type? (+ 1 2)
== integer!
Anton.
Hello list,
there is a difference between the documentation of the + function
in the REBOL dictionary and the one I get with HELP
This has been fixed in REBOL/View 1.2.10.3.1
+ 1 2
== 3
type? (+ 1 2)
== integer!
Anton.
Hello list,
there is a difference between the documentation of the + function
in the REBOL dictionary and the one I get with HELP +.
In the first one usage says that + a b should work, while
* Andrew Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031109 16:57]:
Tim wrote (in another thread):
...comprehending rebol's multi-level evaluation process which is very
different from other (non-lisp) languages.
Is there a need for more information here?
When I get passt my current 'time-crunch', I
Thanks Romano
I am working on your material. I hope to be able to release my 'bind for
dummies soon.
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Romano Paolo Tenca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:40 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: [understanding 'bind]
Hi, Pat
Hi, Pat
Object creation in Rebol it is a little strange. The first times i looked at
Rebol, I read the collowing code:
make object! [
a: 1
]
like: create an object and set its field 'a at 1.
Today I read the code in another mode:
1) create a new context with the word 'a and the word
Hi Patrick,
Has anyone a practical illustration for that kind of usage ?
I wrote a small AWK pseudo-dialect which uses that technique. When you write
your AWK program, you will use certain keywords (e.g. _ to reference the
current, parsed line). I BIND the AWK program block to my processor
20 matches
Mail list logo
