Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson Raised

2000-12-16 Thread ant big ant
did the man really say these things. if so he must have good reason don't you think? ant From: tassy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson Raised Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 10:11:45 +0800 Hi!,

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson raised

2000-11-26 Thread Ian Henderson
y 24 Harfleur PlacePerth, W.A. Hamilton HillTel: 61-8-9418-3972 Western Australia, 6163 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] May all beings be free from the tyranny of my expectations (Miriam Solon) _________________

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson Raised

2000-11-23 Thread Jim Duffield
Pearson I recommend a read of Ashis Nandy. Pearson is a product of a post-colonial environment arguing for its continuation! "Race" and class - history class! jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- http://www.kultcher.com/ --- Jim Duffield "If jade is not polished, it cannot be worth anything.

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson Raised

2000-11-23 Thread tinota
Hi Laurie, You wrote: The difference as I see it, is that Dr. Perkins was saying that 'burn baby burn' could happen if non-Indigenous Australians did not give proper recognition to the problems of Aboriginal people---he put the responsibility for "burn ,baby ,burn" onto the perpetrators of

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson Raised

2000-11-23 Thread Ian Henderson
Why are you sorry Matthew? I for one found it rather refreshing. Ian Henderson. - Original Message - From: "tassy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 10:11 AM Subject: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson Raised Hi!, Sorry for

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson Raised

2000-11-23 Thread tinota
Hi Laurie: You wrote: Sorry Tim, the issue is not ''simply what is said." The issue is the difference between criticising the enemy and giving comfort to the enemy. Okay, so the difference IS between what he said and what the enemies said he said. So you're back to arguing he shouldn't have

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson raised

2000-11-21 Thread tinota
Jason - nice summary. One additional point: when you say "His argumentsare a plea to find new - perhaps even old tradional ways - of combating the'confusiojn-producing mechanisms of the contemporary social and economicorder" I don't think there is any "perhaps" about it. He IS looking

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson raised

2000-11-21 Thread tinota
- and I reckon it ain't Pearson. Cheers Tim -Original Message- From: Trudy Rod Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 12:03 AM Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson raised Tim, I have no quarrel with Pearson's ideas or his p

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson raised

2000-11-21 Thread tinota
Trudy wrote: As it is, it appears he has done them a disservice. Well, maybe it's too early to judge. Hasn't the Qld govt implemented some version of his 'plan' in Cape York? Has this involved a cutback in "welfare" funding? Is that even the question? Is it

Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson raised

2000-11-21 Thread Ian Henderson
-9418-3972 Western Australia, 6163 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Issues Pearson raised my two cents . . . Pearsons 'Light on the Hill' speech recently republished in the Journal of Australina Indigenous Issues takes