manually. However, when I tried to install prog.rpm
again, it says the package is already installed. what should I do
to in! stall the prog.rpm??
1) include a subject in the future
2) post to appropriate lists, like dist-list instead of devel
3) the name for removal is the name
useful knowledge.
Best regards
girish.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John
Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2003 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (no subject)
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, wo shi ni baba wrote:
I knew I would get some flamy
--- John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many experienced people would not have even read
your question, because
you neglected to use the Subject: field to tell us
what you're writing
about.
I will say, that is why I didn't read this thread. The
only reason I read it now, was because I *KNEW
-9957, http://ScienceTools.com/
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, wo shi ni baba wrote:
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:29:48 -0800 (PST)
From: wo shi ni baba [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (no subject)
I knew I would get some flamy follow ups like this from pests
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:22:24AM -0800, Richard Troy wrote:
Sometimes, the offending party shows
themselves to be unworthy of the effort, like this guy. And for all the
hostile flem he flung, he did have one point that was right on target: If
you don't feel like helping him, just
Sometimes, the offending party shows
themselves to be unworthy of the effort, like this guy. And for all the
hostile flem he flung, he did have one point that was right on target: If
you don't feel like helping him, just don't reply. That's my plan. If my
eyeballs are so unfortunate as to see
ni baba
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (no subject)
I knew I would get some flamy follow ups like this from pests
like you, didn't I tell you not to send any follow ups??
here are my answers to your question:
1. I did read
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Ed Greshko wrote:
Where's fire hose when you need it?
man locate
Use the right tool for the job
locate cluebat
AL
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi folks,
I am running redhat 8.0 on an intel machine, I installed an application by using rpm -i prog.rpm, but when I tried to remove it by rpm -e prog.rpm, it couldn't remove it, so I removed the program files manually. However, when I tried to install prog.rpm again, it says the package is
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, wo shi ni baba wrote:
hi folks,
I am running redhat 8.0 on an intel machine, I installed an application by using rpm
-i prog.rpm, but when I tried to remove it by rpm -e prog.rpm, it couldn't remove it,
so I removed the program files manually. However, when I tried to
please dont' post such useless posts to the list, first of all, I asked a beginner question doesn't mean I'm too lazy to read the manual, when I have 20 things over my mind, my patience for a trivial thing like this goes down, that's why I resort to an easy way, hope someone might give me an easy
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, wo shi ni baba wrote:
please dont' post such useless posts to the list, first of all, I asked a beginner
question doesn't mean I'm too lazy to read the manual, when I have 20 things over my
mind, my patience for a trivial thing like this goes down, that's why I resort to
thank you!!
Gary Sandine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rpm(8) was difficult for me to use for learning RPM.This might help for your problem:# rpm -i --force prog.rpm___Redhat-devel-list mailing list[EMAIL
I knew I would get some flamy follow ups like this from pests like you, didn't I tell you not to send any follow ups??
here are my answers to your question:
1. I did read the documentation, but briefly, so what? Not everyone is patient enough to read the manuals all the time. Yes at times, I have
use
rpm -e prog
** no extension .rpm
use rpm -qa | grep prog
to see if the program is installed
=
Ajith C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seismic Software Group
533, GEOPIC,
ONGC, INDIA.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web
.
Many experienced people would not have even read your question, because
you neglected to use the Subject: field to tell us what you're writing
about.
Then, you're on the wrong list. This list is for development issues, and
installing/removing package is not a development issue. The correct list
Where's fire hose when you need it?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Ed Greshko wrote:
Where's fire hose when you need it?
man locate
:)))
cheers,
Anth
--
Anth Courtney
Systems Administrator
Planet Netcom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pnc.com.au
2003 - the year the real Anth Courtney stands up.
iproute and ipchains except you mean graphical tools
/Osaz.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
I think I misinterpreted your question. remote administration hmmm. it is possible to remotely administer a gateway configured as a firewall if there is aVPN connection to the firewall or else its one big waste of time. So you can telnet to the mashine or ssh whatever and configure the
Hello everyone,
I'm new here and would like to contribute to this
team as well as develop on the RedHat platform and Linux in general. So please
don't be to offended by a semi novice input.
Thanks
/Osaz.
unsubscribe bbDS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote:
Have you checked the price if Windows tools?
Look at Delphi, C++ Builder, or any MS Visual *
product. Klyix is on par with the Professional versions
of those tools, and priced better.
True ... but just as Windows products are
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:15:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:15:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Thornton Prime [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RAD tool from Borland
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:53:38 -0500
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:53:38 -0500
From: Ed Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test9 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RAD tool
PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:35:47 -0500
From: Matt Fahrner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Burlington Coat Factory
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RAD tool from Borland
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RAD tool from Borland
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version
DMA(Ultra66) Have Kernel 2.3.3 but error on
compile
Ok well I installed Linux on my machine: P-III 500mhz 128mb Ram 20gb HD 1gb HD Both
are connected to the Promise
Ultra66 DMA controller. And so now I have to type linux ide2=0x10e0, ide3=0x10d4 into
lilo every time I boot. I read
In the preview directory on the 2nd RH7 cdrom, there is a kernel 2.4
optimized RPM of glibc. Since the release of RH7.0, there have been a
couple errata updates of glibc. Can a kernel 2.4 optimized version of
glibc be created from the errata SRPM? What is the procedure?
This is the note
Some here might be interested in this: http://linux.sybase.com/ase/11033downloa
d.html
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 20:57:56 +0800
From: John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (no subject)
I know this is not a development question. I need to trash my NT
workstation and make my linux box the only box
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, jmrm wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:07:16 -0500
From: jmrm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (no subject)
How can I put a password in my ftp server so when somebody
enter to it from a browser like the netscape or the IE 4.0 it
ask them the password
I know this is not a development question. I need to trash my NT
workstation and make my linux box the only box. is there any way that I can
fetch my email from an Exchange server? Server is NOT running pop3. only
available P is MAPI.
Do you mean IMAP?
fetchmail does that.
I know this is not a development question. I need to trash my NT
workstation and make my linux box the only box. is there any way that I can
fetch my email from an Exchange server? Server is NOT running pop3. only
available P is MAPI.
Nahil Garboua Raytheon
I even have to say, that my Linux never hangup until now. And it has an uptime
of nearly 5 month now (damn, s*** f** electricity bill :))
Trisnady is right, right now I recommend to use Linux only as a Server. It's
too much of a change for the users, if they had to use Linux as a
Alexander is right too. You can forget about OS/2. It will be dead in a few years.
Novel is still used as fileserver and it won't die, but it remains to expensive.
And if you compare the price vs productivity, Linux will win.
--
Sent over VO WebMail
http://www.vo.lu
Dear All:
where can I find the documentation for newt
?
I am trying to pipe email to a program. I have read all the sendmail and
linux documentation I can get my hands on. So far, I have placed an
actual copy of my program in the /etc/smrsh directory, set the
permissions, many different ways including 0644, and 4700. for some
reason I still get
: header has "redhat-devel-list-admin" in it, so I
doubt that the second rule would do anything at all. At any
rate, it appears that the list has been fixed a bit, but there
are still some issues.. I haven't had time to check up on what
they are yet though.. At least that annoying sub
proficient developers
subscribe to, and which hopefully technically competant
administrators manage. Putting the listname in the subject makes
me believe that Microsoft runs the list, and that mousers
subscribe by point and shoot.
If the latter is the case, please let me know so I can
unsubscribe.
Whats
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Whats going on here RedHat? Please, can we get some RH response?
The new list software doesn't even insert the proper Reply-To line,
so to reply to the list you have to type its address by hand!
--
Alexander
Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/
The things that really annoy me are the fact that my rules are set up to put
anything sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] into my redhat folder but
whenever most people send stuff it goes straight into my inbox. This is a
real pig if I'm off.
___
At 12:49 +0400 28 Jun 2000, Alex Kanavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new list software doesn't even insert the proper Reply-To line,
Good! Mailing lists shouldn't overwrite Reply-To headers.
so to reply to the list you have to type its address by hand!
No, I don't. I didn't touch the
..
--
Aaron Whiteman - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email with subject 'PGPKey' for pgpkey
RCW 19.190 notice: This address is located in Washington State.
Though I use a Macintosh, I am not a Mac-Bigot. I just hate Windoze.
:wq
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:31:13 +0100
From: Steven Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Redhat-devel-list] subject line and stuff
The things that really annoy me are the fact that my rules are set up to pu
GET RID OF IT!!
It takes too much room on some of our 640x480
screens.
How about just [rh-list]
or even just [list]?
Jonathan Sailor wrote:
GET RID OF IT!!
It takes too much room on some of our 640x480 screens.
How about just [rh-list]
or even just [list]?
[list] -- What a great idea! Every e-mail list on the Internet
should use this suggestion. Hell, why not just use []
it is
kind of content mangling (if Pine is even capable of
doing it), and would rather not get into it for one list (this one).
So, let me put in my vote: PLEASE get rid of that annoying subject
mangling.
--
Edward S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
So, let me put in my vote: PLEASE get rid of that annoying subject
mangling.
If we're voting about it, put in my vote for getting rid of the annoying
subject mangling as well.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" ) writes:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
So, let me put in my vote: PLEASE get rid of that annoying subject
mangling.
If we're voting about it, put in my vote for getting rid of the annoying
subject mangli
Hi:
Why not just make the subject smaller. Like [rh-dev] or something
like that.
Thing is I am subscribed to the poptop and ipchains mailing list,
and I like to know where the traffic is coming, so these subjects
really help in my case.
Just my 2 cents.
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
[EMAIL
Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I was wondering why all of the sudden someone finds it necessary to
add [redhat-devel-list] to the subject of every message from this list.
Please remove this junk. It takes up half of the available subject line
so that the real subject line
it out
until such time as Redhat decides to fix it.
:0hf
* ^Subject:.*\[redhat-dev.*] \]
| sed 's/\[redhat-dev.*]//'
I have not tested it but will this really work?? The subject line I get
comes through as [Redhat-devel-list]. How does [redhat-dev.*] match?
Is there something I do
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:0hf
* ^Subject:.*\[redhat-dev.*] \]
| sed 's/\[redhat-dev.*]//'
OOOPseee
Should have been a capital R in both cases and I left trailing junk
:0hf
* ^Subject:.*\[Redhat-dev.*]
| sed 's/\[Redhat-dev
Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there something I do not understand??
No there is something I do not understand about being carefull when
posting ... especially to a list of developers : )
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL
[ Tom Diehl wrote: ]
Hi all,
I was wondering why all of the sudden someone finds it necessary to
add [redhat-devel-list] to the subject of every message from this list.
Please remove this junk. It takes up half of the available subject line
so that the real subject line scrolls off
On Sun Jun 25 2000 at 08:10, Tom Diehl wrote:
I was wondering why all of the sudden someone finds it necessary to
add [redhat-devel-list] to the subject of every message from this list.
Please remove this junk. It takes up half of the available subject line
so that the real subject line
o procmail
and want to see if my rule is similar to how others code it.
Is this a religious issue? :)
yes. most modern lists put some form of identifier into the subject,
many use the same [list-name] format, although most are smart enough
to drop the "-list" part. The cla
Title:
Hello All,
Firstly if this message reaches the list in HTML, I would like to apologise. Work uses MS Exchange which is a pain and setting my message to plain text usually has no effect.
Does anybody have an idea as to the status of DVD support under RH, My company want's to be sure
Does anybody have an idea as to the status of DVD support under RH, My
company want's to be sure it can anwser any queries from customers regarding
Linux support for our new drives.
We support DVD ROM drives and to an extend DVD RAM. The extra stuff needed
for DVD movie playback is not
62 matches
Mail list logo
