--- wo shi ni baba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you did all I said, good for you, GOOD GOOD,
should I give you some cookies?
peace out
No, but you could have at least had the common
courtesy to at least acknowledge what I told you.
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE-- Red Hat Certified
--- Larry Greenleaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of you seem to forget that you were new to
Linux once. Maybe the people who posted here did
RTFM and did not understand it. Lets be real, some
of these man pages are cryptic at best.
Yes, you are right. I was new to linux at one point in
my
--- John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many experienced people would not have even read
your question, because
you neglected to use the Subject: field to tell us
what you're writing
about.
I will say, that is why I didn't read this thread. The
only reason I read it now, was because I *KNEW*
--- Larry Greenleaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen this post in several other locations.
There are a lot of people, including myself, that
can't seem to get make modules to complete
successfully.
Which kernel version might you be referring to?
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE-- Red
--- wo shi ni baba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I think how questions should be handled:
1.In the case the question is posted to the wrong
forum, politely direct the inquirer to the correct
forum.
I did that.
2.In the case the question lacks a title, politely
tells the person
--- John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, he's trying to control which NIC
is used to install.
Reoving support for other NICs does not affect
what's used later.
Then, he can fiddle with /etc/modules.conf if
necessary.
I personally would simply plug the cable into
whichever
--- John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing the modules for the NICs you don't want to
use will force the
issue;-)
I thought he was trying to designate which card he
wants to be eth0, eth1, etc... so that he can plug
each device into multiple networks/and or designate
which device should
--- Lars Damerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way I can make the device naming more
clear?
This is just something to get your mind working. I
know there is a way to pass options to modules as
they're loaded. Using the IRQ and base address,
couldn't one conceivably assign eth0 to be
--- Lars Damerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Kevin McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wed, Jan
29, 2003 at 11:13:23AM -0800:
This is just something to get your mind working. I
know there is a way to pass options to modules as
they're loaded. Using the IRQ and base address,
couldn't one
--- Florin Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corrupted kernel tarball then?
Download/unpack/compile again?
Did you also verify the source using the PGP key? How
about making the required links to the linux-2.4.20
dir? ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 linux
ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 linux-2.4
--- John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which only checks the path.
See the difference:
[summer@skink incoming]$ which ifconfig
/usr/bin/which: no ifconfig in
--- Jitesh Verma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not see manpage also. 'whereis'
command also
does not show ethtool.
Though this isn't really the appropriate list for this
question, I will still answer with a realistic answer.
You should use the which command instead. It's on many
more
--- Lars Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course the best protection is to turn off and may
be uninstall servers
(services) that you won't be using.
And for an extra, extra layer of protection, if you
have the resources available, you should make each
device on your network and appliance.
--- Jure Pecar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is there any ETA of the next release of RedHat? I
know that 'when it's
ready' is the best answer...
If you knew that was the best answer you were going to
get, then why ask?
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE-- RedHat Certified Engineer
--- Dan Hollis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i haven't played with jfs at all, afaik it is the
most recent of the
bunch. it has interesting features but it seems both
xfs and reiser are
considerably more advanced and tested.
Actually, JFS is the oldest of them all. JFS was the
original
--- Bill Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, I've not noticed anything ... but I havn't
upgraded everything
yet. Do you actually need to use nss_db?
No, I don't need it, but checking my
/etc/nsswitch.conf shows that I'm not using it first
either. That's the strange part. I always have
Can anyone else verify that packages are now being
built with references against an undefined symbol
named __set_errno in the nss_db package from the
current rawhide?
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE-- RedHat Certified Engineer
__
Do You Yahoo!?
--- Bill Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Um, which packages? I havn't noticed anything here
but I'm only up
to about Thursday with Raw Hide ... I'll happily try
a few things or
do a before/after test around upgrading whatever is
causing trouble.
I'm getting problems with nss_db. There
--- Riku Meskanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those of you who haven't had opportunity to
experience HP-UX
features of host cloning,
I guess you've never heard of VMware which
supports host cloning under linux in a few seconds.
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE-- RedHat Certified Engineer
--- John Ellson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, it surprises me that some rpm
dependency errors seem
to not get fixed quickly. Would you like us to
report them?
I think they would rather have us fix them than report
them.
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE-- RedHat Certified Engineer
--- Jeremy Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the same time, it's extremely easy for me to lose
an email about
something in the pile of emails I get every day.
Bugzilla is much better for documenting issues because
every step of the process is put into writing and then
filed into the DB.
--- Trond Eivind Glomsrød [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We only have rsync for official mirror, AFAIK.
As Trond points out... official mirrors use it.
Doesn't that say enough? There are places that mirror
off of redhat that do offer anonymous rsync. In
--- Ivan F. Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftpcopy is good to mirroring redhat files, because
they change the dates without changing the files, I
can specify to
ignore date changes. Also the new version have a
security key for limiting the number of deletes each
time I run. In
the
--- Adam Dingle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I discovered Red Hat's Rawhide FTP directory
(ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/) not
long ago, and I've
successfully grabbed a few packages from it and
installed them on top of my
Red Hat 7.2 installation. OK, so now I've decided
I'm
--- terry barnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What prompted my hypothetical system question is I'm
in the process
of specing out a new file server and I thought maybe
someone here
would know if the setup would overcome the 2 gig
limit I'm
experiencing with our current server.
The largest
--- Panu Matilainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's a 2.4 kernel thing but patches to 2.2
kernel exist too, and
then you need glibc support also. RH7.0 had AFAIR
LFS-support in the
-enterprise kernel but that won't help you with
RH6.1 at all where you'd
need to recompile glibc (and
--- Lee, Myoung Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I'm using redhat-7.2 to make customized redhat cd.
when I run /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/buildinstall,
some errors are
occurred.
.
mke2fs 1.23, 15-Aug-2001.
Wrote /tmp/makebootdisk.tree.11940 ( 604k
compressed, 1175k
--- Erik Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious how RedHat manages it's releases,
especially while balancing the
needs of RedHat users against the fact that most of
the code in your product
comes from somewhere else. For the next release of
RedHat, does the CEO wake
up one morning
--- Jean Francois Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alex Kanavin wrote:
Reiserutils was in 7.2 and I think in 7.1. 7.2
kernel has reiserfs
support and I think 7.1was compiled with ReiserFS
support too. So you
can create and mount ReiserFS partitions if you
want.
I have used
--- Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is about C++ only. C language programs ARE
compatible. Note that
in e.g. 7.x, there is libstdc++-compat libraries, I
expect to find the
same on 8.x, so your C++ programs compiled on 7.x
will run just fine on
8.x -- like 6.x vs 7.x.
I
--- Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Amir,
I recommend to you to buy this book and learn from
it - lots of people told
me it's a good book to learn:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/linuxdrive2/
Some other good ones are:
Understanding the Linux Kernel (also by oreilly)
Linux
31 matches
Mail list logo
