On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Peter Kiem wrote:
Hi Ben,
We're going to be installing 5-10 RedHat OS'es on some Compaq BL10e
blades soon. My question is which version of redhat is the most stable
and friendly to other applications. I'd like to implement the version
Personally I think 7.3 is
Just in case someone wants to use RH9, this is from Dell's Power Edge LINUX list...
Gavin Durman --- Xavier University Systems Administrator
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (513)745-1905http://staff.xu.edu/~durman
Everything appears in shades of
Our organization is currently in the pilot phase of migrating from
different versions of RH 7.x/8.x/9.x(very few) to RH Linux AS.
RH Linux Advanced Server will incorporate a more formal direction for
RedHat re: their support strategy for long term corporate health.
And... If you think about it,
Hi,
We're going to be installing 5-10 RedHat OS'es on some Compaq BL10e blades soon. My
question is which version of redhat is the most stable and friendly to other
applications. I'd like to implement the version of RH that is most compatible with
the RPM's and code out there on the 'Net.
I'd go 8. It's new enough that people will be using it for a while, but
it's not their latest so it's had some time to stabilize. However, I 'm
not sure how long they are supporting it, so you had better find another
source of well-tested updates.
For my post on why you should at least consider
Hi Ben,
We're going to be installing 5-10 RedHat OS'es on some Compaq BL10e
blades soon. My question is which version of redhat is the most stable
and friendly to other applications. I'd like to implement the version
Personally I think 7.3 is just fine for production servers and that is
Hi,
Regarding production, well it depends what type of
production you mean. If its visual effects then I
would strongly recomend you research this to death or
it will be your death as post is insane.
Issues I found in post using Linux client and server;
1) Both NFS client and server are weak.
Hi Bri,
RAID w/o probs other than it does slow. Forget NFS
and Linux for now atleast pre 9. I hope 9 is cool as
I disagree. I am currently using RH7.3 and NFS in production servers and
it is running VERY well.
--
Regards,
+-+-+
|
Hi,
Would you mind sharing some info about your setup?
I'd rather use NFS and autfs/sym links to create a
type of unified dir structure that I usually have done
on SGIs that are very production worthy but am shy to
do so on Linux.
I can make the Linux NFS server choke with 10 clients
and doing
Hi,
I can make the Linux NFS server choke with 10 clients
and doing a dd of /dev/0 let alone rendering 30 procs.
OK perhaps that's where we see a difference then. I am using NFS to mount
from one server to another in a different location. So really there would
only be one client then.
I was
I disagree. I am currently using RH7.3 and NFS in production servers and
it is running VERY well.
I second this, I haven't had any of the problems that you speak of !
Aly.
Aly S.P Dharshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student and System Administrator ORS Servers
A good speech
11 matches
Mail list logo
